![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://www.sportsnet.ca/basketball/...713_185403_5860
The revamped Toronto Raptors have reportedly added another new face. The Raptors have worked out a sign-and-trade deal with the Philadelphia 76ers for guard-forward John Salmons, the Philadelphia Daily News reported Thursday. The 76ers will receive a second-round draft pick and a $2 million US trade exception. Salmons, 26, has reportedly agreed to terms on a $23-million, five-year deal with the Raptors. Salmons chose Toronto over the Phoenix Suns, who could only offer a deal averaging $3.7 million a year due to salary cap constraints. "John had two great choices and chose Toronto based on a variety of factors," Salmons' agent Joel Bell told the Daily News on Thursday. "He wanted to think through all the possibilities before he reached a decision." Salmons averaged 7.5 points, 2.7 rebounds and 2.7 assists in 25.1 minutes while playing all 82 games for Philadelphia last season. The six-foot-six swingman is one of the more unheralded athletes in the NBA, a quality sought by both the retooling Raptors and the run-and-gun Suns. The 26th overall pick in the 2002 draft, Salmons has averaged 5.1 points, 2.1 rebounds, 1.8 assists and 18.4 minutes in 281 career games, all with Philadelphia. The move comes on the same day the Raptors announced the signing of former Maccabi Tel Aviv star Anthony Parker to a three-year deal. To make room on the roster, the Raptors waived point guard Andre Barrett, who averaged 4.6 points and 2.7 assists in 19 games with Toronto last season. The Raptors also called a Friday morning news conference where they will announce the re-signing of all-star forward Chris Bosh to a multi-year contract extension. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Salmons had his chance last year, he came up small. He won't be missed.
----- Kurt Straub "Tunnel ©" <rat@nospam.com> wrote in message news:e96sod$v0e$1@news.datemas.de... Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Salmons will never be more than a 7th or 8th guy at best. Not much of a
loss, but this does hurt the Sixers depth problems. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm rather shocked actually that the Suns had shown the kind of interest in Salmons they apparently did. I guess they saw another Bell in him, but even when Bell was on the Sixers, I liked him a lot more than Salmons - especially since Salmons never proved to be a reliable 3pt shooter. I would say that between that potential move and how they threw away their draft that the Colangelo defection is making itself felt in Phoenix - but then it turns out to be Colangelo that goes and gets Salmons himself. Weird. A few comments on other news: Randolph re-signs: I said somewhere else on the board that I wouldn't be surprised if this happens. But again, it's a non-event. If he's more than an 11th man, it just shows King's limitations and general lack of imagination. I recently saw that Othella Harrington was let go by Chicago. He sounds like a reasonable acquisition as a backup 4/5. He may be a little short for the 5, but he could give some low post scoring off the bench, and there should be possible enough to switch assignments with Hunter, Webber, Dalembert as needed if there were to be a real size mismatch for him among backup 5s. I'd say pick him up once he clears waivers. Green re-signs long term: Meh. It was a mistake to sign him to such a contract before the injury and it is a mistake now. The indications are all looking like Iverson is staying, and Green showed on many occasions that he can't play in the same backcourt. I'd rather just see Carney get the minutes, along with Williams getting the token 6-8 minutes Iverson might sit per game. Why not use the money to find a decent 4/5? Between Green and Randolph, that's close to mid-level exception type money. As far as the continuing Iverson rumours go, it looks like Boston and Atlanta are the only viable destinations left. Apparently, even King won't take the usual Denver and Golden State packages; the Clippers don't seem willing to give away Livingston; and Chicago doesn't have the contracts/cap space to do a deal involving Gordon anymore. So that leaves something like Telfair, Jefferson, Sczerbiak from Boston or Harrington, J. Smith, and change from Atlanta. The Atlanta deal sounds like a rip-off. The Boston one is somewhat interesting, though I've never seen Jefferson play (so I can't affirm for myself how solid a prospect he is) and it doesn't sound as though Boston has offered both Telfair and Jefferson in a deal (it sounds like they'd prefer to send Gerald Green). Again, it looks like Iverson's staying around - and with deals like these, I can't say it's a bad thing. I actually get the feeling that King has now bought into his own platitudes from last year about how the team just wasn't playing hard enough defensively and that the team will just turn around with some cosmetic changes. While on a certain level, I think that if Dalembert benefits from a full, injury free training camp, and Carney can play as advertised, there's enough talent to make the 2nd round, it still doesn't address the fundamental problems not only of the bench but also the fact that Cheeks has never instituted a specific system to maximize whatever effectiveness may be had. It looks like the team is collecting fast, athletic players--in a good way--but how much is Webber going to bitch about not being utilized when he can't keep up?--and how fast will Cheeks give in to him and see the team fall into the formless, disorganized sets that marked last year? -IK Chris Zabel wrote: Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|