![]() |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I do believe you are correct. Watch the press conference on June 30 with Brown and Gibson. At the end they stand up together to get hats and jerseys. It appears to me that Gibson is taller. http://www.nba.com/cavaliers/multim...o_features.html Keith |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:15:16 -0600, "Keith Jones" <kejones1@cox.net>
wrote: Quote:
i would have rather seen him traded, but we're stuck with him. so why not hope that he'll improve? "i can spell. i just can't type." |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
itOn Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:50:28 -0600, "Keith Jones" <kejones1@cox.net>
wrote: Quote:
well, whadya know? the sad part is that shannon brown is even shorter than coach brown. let's just hope he doesn't blow out a knee like phil hubbard did and lose his hops. IMO this explains why he slid so far in the draft. going back to the video, ferry emphasized the defensive capabilities of the two draft picks. this makes me reconsider the trade of A (as opposed to Z) to get basden. maybe it wasn't just dumping guaranteed contract money - they really want guys who can defend on the perimeter. plus basden (at an alleged 6'5") has the size these two draft picks don't for guarding a swingman SF/SG if lebron ever comes out of a game. and as i mentioned before, he's a decent spot up shooter, so if he has 3pt range, he could be a poor man's bruce bowen. and if these backcourt guys can play really tight defense this might result in Z getting more blocks - i expect coach brown to funnel driving opponents towards Z, who at 7'3" can block or affect his share of shots if the guy driving the line is more or less herded towards Z, minimizing Z's lack of lateral motion. and Z will still score his points at the offensive end, unlike ben wallace. "i can spell. i just can't type." |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
"barry" <toisan_boy@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message news:td3oe29r2q1r3kgohj1pqg2e02oqqccmdi@4ax.com... Quote:
jerseys. Quote:
I guess if they really are going all out for defense, this would be great if it pans out. With Lebron, Z, Hughes, Gooden, Marshall and Brown, we will get our offense. Turning Z into a defensive presence with shot blocking ability improves his overall game and us as a team defensively. A defensive frontcourt of Snow, Hughes, Basden, Newble, Brown, and Gibson (that is a lot) sounds pretty solid. Lebron will improve (in fact, he must IMHO, if he ever wants to become an all around player). PF with Gooden and Marshall is not a solid defensive position for us. I like Varejao's defense. Pollard cannot be considered a slouch. I think players like Jones, Jackson, Pavlovic and Gooden that do not play good defense do not fit into coach Brown's long range defensive plans. If they truly go in this direction, which I think is a good one, these players will be gone. I guess it is no coincidence that these are the players they have been trying to unload. I still don't understand the Jones signing last year if this was where they were going. Keith |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:22:53 -0600, "Keith Jones" <kejones1@cox.net>
wrote: Quote:
jones wasn't their first choice - they went after earl watson - but denver overpaid (again), then went after jaska-whatever who went to indiana instead. they needed a backup PG. while i like the defensive emphasis, the NBA rules are evolving to favor offensive minded players, so we still need to have guys who can score. "i can spell. i just can't type." |
|
#26
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
"barry" <toisan_boy@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message news:fnfqe2p7spelv02ckt4451r6vnguppa8gg@4ax.com... Quote:
surprised Quote:
with Quote:
if Quote:
get Quote:
ability Quote:
he Quote:
is Quote:
Pavlovic Quote:
long Quote:
is Quote:
IIRC, they went after Marko Jaric, who went to Minnesota then Jasekeviceis-whatever who went to Indy. Quote:
What are the new changes? The problem as I see it is that Jones is such a huge defensive liabilty, how do you give him minutes. We saw him disappear against Washington in the playoffs for that reason. You can really only spot him at certain times or try to hide him defensively If used this way, we really overpaid for him. Keith |
|
#27
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:15:20 -0600, "Keith Jones" <kejones1@cox.net>
wrote: Quote:
his name was bandied about but i doubt that we were all that serious about jaric since he was a RFA. not only would the clippers have matched, i suspect that a fear was that the contract would have also set the bar for all other players with comparable stats. as it turned out, denver signing earl watson to that stupid contract was a factor influencing ferry to give damon jones that extra &%$#* year. amazing how much better the clippers became when jaric & simmons left. and to think we might have had a chance to get corey maggette (or lamar odom) instead of darius miles. Quote:
the changing of rules on defense, prohibiting hand checking, that kind of stuff is designed to make it easier for people to drive to the basket, etc. my take is that NBA thinks that watching a team like the pistons is like watching two soccer teams play to a 0-0 tie. i suspect that the fear is that the typical TV viewer isn't astute enough to appreiciate the intricacies in getting a series of defensive stops and shooting 30% for the game vs. 120-119 scores with lots of dunks & layups and would get bored and switch to some other channel. there's probably some validity to that. the typical fan is pretty stupid. the good coaches will find a way though - i recall reading a while back how pat riley taught a technique of face guarding as a legal way of disrupting the guy dribbling the ball when the rule changes began lessening the amount of allowable physical contact. Quote:
"i can spell. i just can't type." |
|
#28
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"barry" <toisan_boy@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message news:spcte2tbboi3fleqousabhm1n3ha1qb6fn@4ax.com... Quote:
<kejones1@cox.net> Quote:
really Quote:
away Quote:
shorter Quote:
phil Quote:
in Quote:
bowen. Quote:
share Quote:
Z, Quote:
great Quote:
will Quote:
a Quote:
if Quote:
Marshall Quote:
Pollard Quote:
think Quote:
that Quote:
going. Quote:
How will they prohibit hand checking with everyone doing it. How else can you keep a guy in the post from scoring at will? I think this will result in so many personal fouls that it will be boring to watch. And you had better have a deep bench. I don't see how any team will be a good defensive team with this rule. There will be no team holding anybody under 100 points. I expect 30% of a team's points to come from free throws. Boring and slow. Now I am thoroughly bummed. Why are we building a team around defense? Quote:
how Quote:
or Quote:
him. Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|