When Mourinho slings mud, football is left a little dirtier

Jose Mourinho would do better to rise above squabbling rather than
trade insults with other clubs.

Some fucking hope http://tinyurl.com/lvzz3

The blokes a spoilt cunt

<nigeleeezzzz@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1157567950.287586.159050@d34g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...

Pathetic article, this is the sort of non-relevent shit that Harvey
relishes.

"b" <billy@thefridge.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:sGJLg.3041$a9.1156@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk. ..

Because it criticises Mourinho?

"b" <billy@thefridge.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:sGJLg.3041$a9.1156@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk. ..

Do you really think so Bill?

I know you are a die hard, thick and thin Chelsea man.- but take a step back
from the obvious human response to stick up for your club - and try to view
things from elsewhere.

I think you would really see that the article is pretty reasonably balanced.

And whether you and your bum monkey - (the Jabberwok) choose to believe it.
It really is the way that people view your club. NOW!

sad but true...........

"Ian Harvey" <ianeharvey@whateveridontreadit.com> wrote in message
news:hvOdnd45qJrcjp3YRVny2g@pipex.net...

not at all. He deserves critisism for quite a few things but on this
particular
occasion any critisism should be aimed at kenyon not JM. This 'journalist'
has a history of digging out JM regardless of blame/event. On the contrary
Oliver
Holt seems to defend Chelsea more often than not. Just because somebody
writes for a paper it doesn't mean we should all blindly agree with what
they
say, which is what the OP obviously did on this occasion.Infact I doubt he
even
read it within the context of this weeks events

"Mick Cooper" <keepth@spam.com> wrote in message
news:zN-dna65CfN0EJ3YnZ2dnUVZ8tadnZ2d@bt.com...
balanced.

please explain where the 'balanced' part is!


Is it no wonder if they lap up crap like that?
How do most people form views? via the press.
There are plenty of people who I think are total
fuckwits and yet I've never met them, sat down
with them, had a cup of tea with them, but my
perception of them is 100% down to how the
press want me to percieve them.
Some niave people believe power lies in parliament,
the reality is that it lies in the hands of Murdoch and his ilk.

"b" <billy@thefridge.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:OMlMg.21290$H03.16908@fe3.news.blueyonder.co. uk...

simple

He isn't a diehard chelsea fan. You are super sensitive to criticism for a
situation that you KNOW would piss you off if it wasn't your team that had
the current infrastructure that it now has.

You're loyal. But you're not stupid - and you talk too much sense to not
have the brains to recognise the manipulative situation that your club now
finds itself in.

Your team and club was a puppet of one ego monster who nearly took it to
deaths door in the search of glory - Bates, and was rescued as if by the act
of a euro lottery triple - triple mega draw situation, when the russian
thief decided to play god with a football team.

At first I had wished it had happened to Spurs - but now I'm glad it didn't.

Its really nothing more than a form of cheating

Its just that the drug is an obscene amount of money.

its a bit like supporting Ben Johnson

"Mick Cooper" <keepth@spam.com> wrote in message
news:2IWdnVmrO4gLdpzYnZ2dnUVZ8tednZ2d@bt.com...

I'm not questioning his support I'm questioning what relevence his column
had
to the events of the day!
Fuck all is the answer.

I wasn't happy with the timing of the club issuing the statement, 'the
club' as opposed
to JM....
They should have dealt with it when the problem arose, Gallas is a very
lucky boy in
that Chelsea were more determined to sign Cole than keep Gallas otherwise he
would be rightly spending the next 12 months rotting on the sidelines.

You are super sensitive to criticism for a situation that you KNOW would
piss you off if it wasn't your team that had

You are so wrong on that point mate. I'd have been:
a/ suicidal if it had been Arsenal
b/ Majorly narked if it had been Liverpool or Man U
c/ Pissed off if it had been Spurs or Millwall.
d/ Not bothered if it had been anyone else.

At the end of the day this has not affected Spurs, Newcastle, Everton,
Villa, WHU
(apart from saving them from bankruptcy....) (and wouldn't have affected
Chelsea
in their position if it had been anyone else) at all as, and lets be honest
here,
none of them were ever going to win the league for the forseeable future.

I assume your ire will also now be directed at Fratton Park, Villa Park and
possibly Upton Park? I'm afraid it's the future now, these clubs know they
can't
compete with Arsenal and Man U, let alone Chelsea,without MASSIVE injections
of new (and foreign it seems) cash.


act
'The Russian Thief' You're in Harvey mode there mate, we've had a few
thieves of
our own remember, didn't Maggie flog off 'my' Utilities companies and
Housing stock
to win power?

didn't.

Easy to say now

Hence Chelsea winning the quadruple the last 2 years? Doesn't look like
we're that good at 'cheating' does it?

Mourinhos still a cunt

<nigeleeezzzz@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1157758407.068084.42330@d34g2000cwd.googlegro ups.com...
He speaks highly of you.