Sports Forums  

Go Back   Sports Forums > Baseball > Cleveland Indians
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-05-2006, 01:02 AM
Steve Steve is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 220
Default That Broussard Trade Really a Lot Better than It First Looked


"barry" <toisan_boy@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vmd8i2do6o6bdqdhvq2t4er0j09k6vr6jo@4ax.com...
Quote:
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 08:27:19 -0400, "Steve" <steveoneill@alltel.net> wrote:
Quote:
"barry" <toisan_boy@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:5ei6i25kihb4stv4m5da3dhok613t4csv6@4ax .com...
Quote:
that sounds like a pretty ignorant statement when you consider dolan shelled out over THREE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS on a business the previous owner spent only 45 million.


Calling someone ignorant Barry, who was waaay more on target
with where the Tribe would be this year than you were is ignorant
in and of itself. All of your Shapiro and Dolan apologies ring even hollower
now than they did last winter.

Wait till next year, though, right ?

It's all about money to these multi-millioanaires
like my golf game is all about money to me.
It's my hobby....It's their hobby.

For all this boo-hoo about this is a business, expenses,
and - wait while I dry my eyes, escalating player salaries,
eight teams are in the post season. As with every other year
of the Dolan/Shapiro reign, the Tribe is not.

If Dolan took $501 to a $500 per hand blackjack table, he should go
somewhere else.

And bad mouth Steinbrenner all you want, and, believe me I hate the Yankees.
But - he wants to win. He does what he needs to try to achieve that goal.
And he doesn't tolerate losing. And don't give me any more poor Dolan and
poor Cleveland's market share. Dolan's got more money than the pope, and
he's content fielding a losing team.


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-07-2006, 12:32 PM
Doug Doug is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 26
Default That Broussard Trade Really a Lot Better than It First Looked


"barry" <toisan_boy@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vmd8i2do6o6bdqdhvq2t4er0j09k6vr6jo@4ax.com...
Quote:
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 08:27:19 -0400, "Steve" <steveoneill@alltel.net> wrote:
Quote:
"barry" <toisan_boy@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:5ei6i25kihb4stv4m5da3dhok613t4csv6@4ax .com...
Quote:
your premise concerning wedges' platooning is refuted by the results of wedge's platooning of perez & broussard - who combined to hit .316 21 HRs 68 RBIs in only 367 ABs. ironically, they did not perform as well once they got to seattle, but they still combined fort 30 HR & 96 RBIsfor the entire season - wihich is actually slightly better than what i projected at the beginning of the season - they turned out to be a pretty good stop-gap bargain at only $4.5mil a year.
That is correct Shapiro was 1 for 2006,and the 1st base platoon system was it.
i think the other half of that choice was an underlying assumption that the year would provide time for garko to take to playing 1st. had we overpaid to get a fulltime 1B, if garko were ready in 2007 (which is not a foregone conclusion) there would be somebdy in his way - in much the same way that jim thome's presence made sean casey expendable. and you aren't including the assumption that blake would bounce back - which he did - and the overall assumption that the offense would be productive as it was constutued - which it was. the starting pitchiers (outisde of the choice of jason johnson - who i thought would work out well) each finished with records above for .500 - pretty impressive for a team that finshed under .500. and mgmt was willing to admit that they made a mistake and cut him loose - and boston took him IIRC.
Quote:
Whether or not two spots on the ML roster is agood idea for one and only one position is a different matter.
it was never stated explicitly but i believe that perez was also a backup plan for balke - had blake not come around, i think michaels would have gone to RF & perez would have also platooned with blake.
Quote:
Again though, worrying about the spending of multi-millionaireowners is something that I have to laugh about. I'm sure Dolangets a warm and fuzzy feeling knowing that some peon fans careabout what amounts to chump change for him.
that sounds like a pretty ignorant statement when you consider dolan shelled out over THREE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS on a business the previous owner spent only 45 million. yes, jacobs revvied the indians, but the bottom line had been and always will be MONEY, not whether steve is pleased. jacobs was astute enough to realize that his revenue stream was maxxed out and he had a LOT of downstream expenses in terms of escalating salaries and contract renewals for aging veterans. if his main priority was to keep steve happy, i doubt he'd have sold right at the top of the market and made top dollar - and a profit of over 250 milllion dollars (and proabbly colser to 300 million if you believe in some alleged creative accounting). and for all jacobs did - the indians never won a world series. for doan to duplicate jacobs' success, he needs to identify young talent, lock them up to realtively inexpensive long term salaries early in their careers. but you can't become younger, cheaper AND BETTER. the main problem is that when you're in a business where there's always at least one idiot willing to pay top dollar for talent like a steinbrenner who's got a geographical advantage in terms of revenue streams, it's going to be tougher to compete. what MLB needs most is a salary cap. "i can spell. i just can't type."


Boston certainly got the best of trading with the Indians this year.


Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-08-2006, 03:32 AM
barry barry is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 409
Default That Broussard Trade Really a Lot Better than It First Looked

On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 08:32:53 -0400, "jpmorgoil" <fabien@toast.net>
wrote:
Quote:
Boston certainly got the best of trading with the Indians this year.


the way i see it, we swapped suspect relievers, (our mgmt never said
so out loud, but wedge no longer had confidence in riske) and the jury
is still out on marte - but given what ahppened with phillips i doubt
we'll proclaim him our everyday 3B even if mgmt secretly believes that
he'll be fine, and we gave away a spare CF who wasn't as good as our
regular CF which gives us a chance to fill that defensive spot with a
bonafide power hitter, not to mention our 3B of the future,
with boston theoretically benefitng more in the short run. and let's
not forget plus whoever else they gave up to atlanta just to get marte
to be able to get crisp.

and they got:

- someone in crisp who helped lead the red sox to 10th place in runs
and 16th in overall batting average by getting demoted from the
leadoff spot and whose stats were inferior to the guy we got to take
his place who played more games, got more hits (including extra base
hits) , a higher BA, scored more runs and got more walks?

- someone in riske who pitched a grand total of 8 games spanning 9
innings this season?





"i can spell. i just can't type."
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-08-2006, 03:12 PM
Steve Steve is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 220
Default That Broussard Trade Really a Lot Better than It First Looked


"barry" <toisan_boy@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:v1qgi2lt495bjun05gk18g19842tiut3q6@4ax.com...
Quote:
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 08:32:53 -0400, "jpmorgoil" <fabien@toast.net> wrote:
Quote:
Boston certainly got the best of trading with the Indians this year.
the way i see it, we swapped suspect relievers, (our mgmt never said so out loud, but wedge no longer had confidence in riske) and the jury is still out on marte - but given what ahppened with phillips i doubt we'll proclaim him our everyday 3B even if mgmt secretly believes that he'll be fine, and we gave away a spare CF who wasn't as good as our regular CF which gives us a chance to fill that defensive spot with a bonafide power hitter, not to mention our 3B of the future, with boston theoretically benefitng more in the short run. and let's not forget plus whoever else they gave up to atlanta just to get marte to be able to get crisp. and they got: - someone in crisp who helped lead the red sox to 10th place in runs and 16th in overall batting average by getting demoted from the leadoff spot and whose stats were inferior to the guy we got to take his place who played more games, got more hits (including extra base hits) , a higher BA, scored more runs and got more walks? - someone in riske who pitched a grand total of 8 games spanning 9 innings this season?

And as we all saw, the owner and GM did nothing to improve a 93 win
2005 team, replaced three decent to good pitchers with two duds (Johnson /
Mota)
and one ok #5 starter (Byrd), and left some of the best players in AAA
(Sowers / Garko).

For all the talk wrt the Crisp trade, the end result of Crisp for Michaels
amounted to
rearranging Deck Chairs on the Titanic. With Mota playing the role of
Iceberg.

The end result was another year of not making the playoffs, and listening to
ownership
and "management" talk about next year. Good thing for modern Technology
(CDs),
otherwise the vinyl record titled "Wait till Next Year" would be worn out,
requiring
poor Dolan to spend another $7.95 on a replacement.



Quote:
"i can spell. i just can't type."



Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-08-2006, 04:59 PM
barry barry is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 409
Default That Broussard Trade Really a Lot Better than It First Looked

On Sun, 8 Oct 2006 11:12:43 -0400, "Steve" <steveoneill@alltel.net>
wrote:
Quote:
"barry" <toisan_boy@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:v1qgi2lt495bjun05gk18g19842tiut3q6@4ax .com...
Quote:
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 08:32:53 -0400, "jpmorgoil" <fabien@toast.net> wrote:
Quote:
Boston certainly got the best of trading with the Indians this year.
the way i see it, we swapped suspect relievers, (our mgmt never said so out loud, but wedge no longer had confidence in riske) and the jury is still out on marte - but given what ahppened with phillips i doubt we'll proclaim him our everyday 3B even if mgmt secretly believes that he'll be fine, and we gave away a spare CF who wasn't as good as our regular CF which gives us a chance to fill that defensive spot with a bonafide power hitter, not to mention our 3B of the future, with boston theoretically benefitng more in the short run. and let's not forget plus whoever else they gave up to atlanta just to get marte to be able to get crisp. and they got: - someone in crisp who helped lead the red sox to 10th place in runs and 16th in overall batting average by getting demoted from the leadoff spot and whose stats were inferior to the guy we got to take his place who played more games, got more hits (including extra base hits) , a higher BA, scored more runs and got more walks? - someone in riske who pitched a grand total of 8 games spanning 9 innings this season?
And as we all saw, the owner and GM did nothing to improve a 93 win2005 team, replaced three decent to good pitchers with two duds (Johnson /Mota)and one ok #5 starter (Byrd), and left some of the best players in AAA(Sowers / Garko).For all the talk wrt the Crisp trade, the end result of Crisp for Michaelsamounted torearranging Deck Chairs on the Titanic. With Mota playing the role ofIceberg.The end result was another year of not making the playoffs, and listening toownershipand "management" talk about next year. Good thing for modern Technology(CDs),otherwise the vinyl record titled "Wait till Next Year" would be worn out,requiringpoor Dolan to spend another $7.95 on a replacement.


you can whine with the best of them, but i've NEVER seen an actual
feasible alternative out of you. if all you do is complain, you're as
much the problem as anything else.



"i can spell. i just can't type."
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-08-2006, 05:16 PM
Steve Steve is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 220
Default That Broussard Trade Really a Lot Better than It First Looked


"barry" <toisan_boy@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6fbii2t7bj8as1ctpqsere8cnru098haii@4ax.com...
a replacement.
Quote:
you can whine with the best of them, but i've NEVER seen an actual feasible alternative out of you. if all you do is complain, you're as much the problem as anything else.


That's because you simply like to hear yourself talk.

I'm part of the problem ?
I watched every game, and drove 130 miles up and back three times this year
and bought tickets, concessions, and gear for myself, and a 5 and 6 year
old.

I bet Dolan would like to have more problems like me.

I've always said one thing:
Sign and keep your proven players.

I'd have never let Thome go, and I'd have kept Omar.
Probably would have kept Manny.
Never would've brought in Boone on the cheap.
I'd have kept Bartolo.
Yes, he may be worn out now, but, there's a lot of wins the Tribe let get
away.
I'd play to win every year, and don't buy into the "Wait till next year"
myths.

(Insert blurb about poor Dolan and how the road to the poor house starts
here).

Now, you probably don't count that methodology as an alternative,
because it goes against the tactics and strategies of your
heros, Mark and Larry. So, don't say I'm a problem, and have no ideas about
how to better run the team just because they don't mesh with your So. Cal.
attitude and love for Larry and Mark. I've followed this team since the
early 60s.

One thing is certain -
Nothing that Mark and Larry have done has resulted in a Playoff appearance.
That empirically proven result is fact.

"I can spell, and I can't wait till next year"

Steve


Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:58 AM.


MyLounge.com Site Map
Forum: Cars, Cell Phone, Database, Games, Home Improvement, IT, Music, School, Sports, Web Design, Web Server, Weight Loss

The MyLounge.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for any advice. The information contained on MyLounge.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of MyLounge.com. MyLounge.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of MyLounge.com Term of Service

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.