![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
macclatchy is simply out of his mind if he thinks that payroll is not important as to whether the team is conpetitive or not. look for year 15 of under .500 baseball with no end in sight. http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06273/726378-63.stm Pirates Notebook: Payroll not as important as right decisions, McClatchy says Saturday, September 30, 2006 By Dejan Kovacevic, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Kevin McClatchy revealed a month ago that the Pirates' 2007 player payroll would remain "flat," in the range of $47 million. But the firm figure, which might be made known in the coming week, still probably will make headlines, if only because of the team's position among the lowest spenders in Major League Baseball. McClatchy, the managing general partner, clearly wishes it would not receive so much attention. "I think payroll is overblown," he said. "If you do the job you're supposed to do with your minor-league system and get the players in place, payroll will become less of an issue." He cited outside examples. "Somebody could look at the amount of money the Toronto Blue Jays spent this offseason and say, well, that should guarantee a playoff spot. Or, quite frankly, the Boston Red Sox. Then, you look at the flip side, and the Florida Marlins, because they spent $15 million, should have the worst record in baseball. Payroll is not indicative, exactly, of how successful you're going to be." Toronto spent $72 million, Boston $120 million, and neither is in the postseason. Florida will finish just below .500. "I'm sure everybody's going to get caught up in the payroll number," McClatchy continued. "If people think that we're up another $5 million and that's going to make or break the organization, I'll let people believe that. "I believe that, if we do our jobs the right way, payroll will be less important. And the development of the players we have, that will be more important." One also could point, of course, to the Pirates' increase from $35 million last season to $47 million this season that did not exactly result in a rise in the standings. "We took our payroll up 25 percent last year," McClatchy said. "Did we make the best investments in that marketplace? No, and I think everybody would agree with that. But have we continued to develop our players? Yes, we have. Now, we have a good group here, so let's do a good job of reducing the number of players we need to go out and get and make sure we bring in the right ones when we do, and I think we're going to be in a good spot." |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think McClatchy should get his head out of his ass. The gas up there is
having a major effect on his thinking process. You have to spend money to make money. Oh, you have to spend money "wisely" to make money and to put a winner on the field. The current management team in Pittsburgh is only interested in one thing; money in the owner's pockets. No need to spend more money than the league gives them in revenue sharing. "dwjones45" <dwjones45@comcast.net> wrote in message news:PuydnTM3YblY44PYnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@comcast.com... Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
""The Real" Matt Davis" <MDavis@KBradio.com> wrote in message news:FjvTg.9964$6S3.2803@newssvr25.news.prodigy.ne t... Quote:
But he IS right. Money is not the deciding factor. Smart decisions are more important than spending $6 million on Jeremy Burnitz. I don't think this management staff knows what it is doing and giving them more money is not the answer. More money to play with is only going to result in the signing of TWO Burnitz's this season, not one. John Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John" <j_dahlgren@adelphia.net> wrote in message news 4WdnZRJm-N_CYPYnZ2dnUVZ_qGdnZ2d@adelphia.com...Quote:
True, then we'll have a balanced bench. Each will be holding down separate ends. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Has PG taken over KM's mind?!!!
I for one am looking forward to next season. Of course I always say that, but hey, I'm a masochist at heart! "dwjones45" <dwjones45@comcast.net> wrote in message news:PuydnTM3YblY44PYnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@comcast.com... Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
John wrote:
Quote:
This is the first thing the guy has said that makes any sense. Once he gets to the point that he realizes with absolute certainty that the decisions made (or not) are what's holding back his franchise, then he can start to address the question of whether the people he employees in a decision making capacity are capable of making the right ones. I'm crossing my fingers and hoping this is not just media blather and he's finally coming around. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|