![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Barutan Seijin <barutanseijin@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
You make such a compelling argument, grasshopper. G -- Chaos Digest: an oasis of information... we think <http://www.chaosdigest.com/> |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Am 4 Oct 2006, The G. schrieb:
Quote:
In my other/previous posts. To sum up: This team has proved that it has last place talent. Baker was a problem, but he was not the main problem. Lack of talent was. Now maybe MacPhail was calling all the shots -- we simply don't know -- but Hendry was at least nominally responsible for assembling the team. Hendry appears to have been making bad decisions for a while, and his past 2 winters have been horrible. Looking at his results, Hendry is probably worse at his job than Baker. If Hendry stays, he'll continue making stupid and non-productive moves and the team will not improve in any meaningful way. -- barutanseijin@gmail.com |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|