Sports Forums  

Go Back   Sports Forums > Baseball > Philadelphia Phillies
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-04-2006, 09:03 PM
Mike Mike is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 186
Default what to do now (long)

"Dennis" <doc.go.irish@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159972990.894963.213660@h48g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
Quote:
Kurt Straub wrote:
Quote:
Left Field. The best solution is to push the magic button and make Pat Burrell revert back to the guy who played in April May and July. The guy

who
Quote:
played in August and September was just awful, I hope I never see him

again.
Quote:
If the real Pat Burrell won't stand up, and they aren't in RF, then we

could
Quote:
consider a platoon of Dellucci and Conine, the chief problem being that Dellucci is a free agent, and says he wants to leave. He may change his

mind
Quote:
if he is promised a starting job in LF and enough $$$. If we can sign Dellucci, I'd be fine with sending Burrell off to anyone who will pay

his
Quote:
salary. Conine is done. He was useless down the stretch. I'd like to have Dellucci back and give him the starting job at a corner outfielder, on the assumption the Phils won't spend money for a new outfielder. Wade screwed the Phils big time with Burrell's contract (Lieberthal's, Abreu's, Thome's, etc.) and have undone much of his mess already, and we would give away Burrell like Abreu and Thome. I liked the Thome trade at first, but Victorino made Rowand an extra.



Regarding Burrell's and Abreu's contracts, we need to keep in mind that they
were backloaded contracts. Meaning the early years of said contracts were
for less than the going rate for the perceived value. This was done so the
Phils would have more money available to spend elsewhere in those early
years. IOW, the Phils got the early years (of those contracts) of Burrell
and Abreu at a bargain rate considering what their compensation would have
been through arbitration or free agency (at the time of eligibility).

As for Burrell's production this season, his per plate appearance HR rate
and RBI rate were only second on the team to Howard. Utley was third.
Although Burrell's RISP numbers were down this year (this was the only year
his were down, no reason to expect they won't rebound back to career
average), his overall production wasn't as bad as many fans think or
perceive.

For a contract/production comparison, here is a partial list of players paid
around the same as (or more than) Burrell while producing less this past
season:

Jeff Bagwell
Jim Edmonds
Luis Gonzalez
Shawn Green
Todd Helton
Derrek Lee
Edgar Renteria
Scott Rolen

I guess my point is, Burrell has been getting a lot of flack as of late but
his actual production hasn't been as bad as many fans believe. Especially
considering that he played most (if not all) of the season less than 100%
healthy. I guess with Abreu gone, Burrell has become the next "whipping
boy". Perhaps the reason is the PR department is playing the situation as
such because ownership/management wants to pare payroll even further (if
this is the case, don't be surprised if they pocket the savings). But can
anyone here honestly say that the likes of a Bourn or a Roberson can
compensate for the loss of production resulting from ditching Burrell?


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-04-2006, 09:16 PM
greg's fotomulighet greg's fotomulighet is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,777
Default what to do now (long)

BeastFish wrote:
Quote:
I guess my point is, Burrell has been getting a lot of flack as of late but his actual production hasn't been as bad as many fans believe. Especially considering that he played most (if not all) of the season less than 100% healthy. I guess with Abreu gone, Burrell has become the next "whipping boy". Perhaps the reason is the PR department is playing the situation as such because ownership/management wants to pare payroll even further (if this is the case, don't be surprised if they pocket the savings). But can anyone here honestly say that the likes of a Bourn or a Roberson can compensate for the loss of production resulting from ditching Burrell?


You can't really. The problem with Burrell is expectations and
perception. Being a #1 overall, plus the guy who was supposed to make up
for losing Drew, there's tons of expectation. And because he looks SO
BAD when striking out, looking at 3rd strikes and jumping back 10 feet
on balls at th heart of the plate, it looks worse than it is. It's
especially infuriating when he has those stretches where he looks like
he gets it -- short, sweet swings and a good eye, his natural strength
driving balls without the windmilling hacks that send him all
off-kilter, the trademark of his lost periods.

A lower 1st round or lower round pick who at least didn't look confused
when slumping woudn't engender so much emnity.

-greg
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-04-2006, 10:13 PM
WildWeasel WildWeasel is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 243
Default what to do now (long)


"greg's impeccable blahs" wrote ...
Quote:
BeastFish wrote:
Quote:
I guess my point is, Burrell has been getting a lot of flack as of late but his actual production hasn't been as bad as many fans believe. Especially considering that he played most (if not all) of the season less than 100% healthy. I guess with Abreu gone, Burrell has become the next "whipping boy". Perhaps the reason is the PR department is playing the situation as such because ownership/management wants to pare payroll even further (if this is the case, don't be surprised if they pocket the savings). But can anyone here honestly say that the likes of a Bourn or a Roberson can compensate for the loss of production resulting from ditching Burrell?
You can't really. The problem with Burrell is expectations and perception. Being a #1 overall, plus the guy who was supposed to make up for losing Drew, there's tons of expectation. And because he looks SO BAD when striking out, looking at 3rd strikes and jumping back 10 feet on balls at th heart of the plate, it looks worse than it is. It's especially infuriating when he has those stretches where he looks like he gets it -- short, sweet swings and a good eye, his natural strength driving balls without the windmilling hacks that send him all off-kilter, the trademark of his lost periods. A lower 1st round or lower round pick who at least didn't look confused when slumping woudn't engender so much emnity.


I agree with that, and would add the "less than 100% healthy". BUT, he needs to
get fixed what ails him this off-season, not let time heal all wounds. Foot,
wrist, swing, psyche, whatever, *Get*it*fixed*.


Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-05-2006, 06:35 AM
Mike Mike is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 186
Default what to do now (long)

"greg's impeccable blahs" <**@**.org> wrote in message
news:eg18as$17iu$1@netnews.upenn.edu...
Quote:
BeastFish wrote:
Quote:
I guess my point is, Burrell has been getting a lot of flack as of late

but
Quote:
his actual production hasn't been as bad as many fans believe.

Especially
Quote:
considering that he played most (if not all) of the season less than

100%
Quote:
healthy. I guess with Abreu gone, Burrell has become the next "whipping boy". Perhaps the reason is the PR department is playing the situation

as
Quote:
such because ownership/management wants to pare payroll even further (if this is the case, don't be surprised if they pocket the savings). But

can
Quote:
anyone here honestly say that the likes of a Bourn or a Roberson can compensate for the loss of production resulting from ditching Burrell? You can't really. The problem with Burrell is expectations and perception. Being a #1 overall, plus the guy who was supposed to make up for losing Drew, there's tons of expectation. And because he looks SO BAD when striking out, looking at 3rd strikes and jumping back 10 feet on balls at th heart of the plate, it looks worse than it is. It's especially infuriating when he has those stretches where he looks like he gets it -- short, sweet swings and a good eye, his natural strength driving balls without the windmilling hacks that send him all off-kilter, the trademark of his lost periods. A lower 1st round or lower round pick who at least didn't look confused when slumping woudn't engender so much emnity. -greg



Funny thing... Burrell and Drew had virtually identical seasons, production
wise (and Drew cost $2 million more).


Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-05-2006, 12:39 PM
damrodd damrodd is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 207
Default what to do now (long)

>I guess with Abreu gone, Burrell has become the next "whipping
Quote:
boy".


You nailed it. I don't think the Phans will be satisfied until we see
a corner outfield combo of Roberson and Victorino. I'm guessing that
combo wouldn't be very productive, but I also thought Abreu was a great
player for the Phils, so what do I know....

Kyle

Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-05-2006, 02:58 PM
Paul W Paul W is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7
Default what to do now (long)

Dennis wrote:
Quote:
Paul W wrote:
Quote:
Dennis wrote:
Quote:
Paul W wrote: > > Outfield: Rowand LF, Bourn CF, Victorino RF That's a HORRIBLE outfield. I can deal with Victorino's production in center field, but not as a corner outfielder. Rowand does NOT qualify as a corner outfielder- that's half the production you want. I've seen NOTHING that indicates Bourn can hit major league pitching, he's another Roberson as far as I'm concerned.
Well we disagree. With all the runs you are scoring you can have non-power guys in the OF. Oh no, we won't be first in Runs Scored and might be 2nd or 3rd? Boo Hoo. The extra defence you get would be very nice and will allow you do depend less on the HR to score.
When are you willing to sacrifice runs?


For defense which wins baseball games.
Quote:
Bourn ain't there.


He deserves a look and go from there. Going as the 4th outfielder is
fine for me.
Quote:
As for Rowand, what choice does he have? He had a below average year for the money he's going to make in 2007. Good luck going somewhere else and getting the same money. Huh? I have no idea what you're trying to say in relation to this conversation.


You were the one who said Rowand wouldn't like playing LF. I'm just
saying 'Too Bad.'
Quote:
That's great that he's fast an all, but you can't have a one-dimensional player at a corner outfield spot. That's the 2nd biggest offensive position in baseball.


That is only a general rule, when you are getting extra runs from
positions that you don't expect it (SS and 2B), you can afford less
power.
Quote:
It's his first full year in the majors. Give the guy a break. His last full year at AAA with a .310 AVG, .377 OBP, .534 SLG for a .911 OPS doesn't look bad. Did you expect for him to reproduce those numbers in his first year? Give him some time. He only walked 24 times with 415 at-bats this season. Players don't learn plate discipline at 25 years old. He is what he is, he may hit for a higher average, he may get a few more extra base hits, but he's not going to be a .400 OBP leadoff guy that every other team in baseball looks for.


I don't know that and neither do you. Is he your leadoff guy day 1
next season? Likely not, but he could be later on in the season.
Quote:
For as much as we might
Quote:
not like it, the Phils were very successful scoring runs with him there.
Um, Utley and Howard have extraordinary offensive seasons and they don't make the playoffs. Not good enough.


So you think the answer is scoring more runs? Pitching and Defense is
what this team needs! This team will score.
Quote:
> We need to improve the 3 spot and get a lefty if possible. Lieber has > value (and likely the most value of the group) and you might be able to > swap Lieber for a better pitcher if you package him with someone else. > Rowand? Floyd? Other minor league players? Jason Schmidt Schmidt, is a FA so you can't trade for him and there is NO WAY the Phils are going to pay him the going rate. I never said to trade for him. I know he's a FA. I'm saying that's what I would do and Gillick going after him last offseason gives me reason to believe he's thinking the same thing.


The Phils will not get Jason Schmidt. Just give it up now. He costs
too much and his history says he will be hurt.
Quote:
Moyer can be 5th starter MAYBE, but NO NO NO Floyd or Brito. They suck. Too early to see with Floyd. Floyd has no control. You seem to expect players to transform their careers and become players they are not.


No, Floyd has had control and success at every level, until hitting the
majors. I'm not going to give up on him after one full season.

However, on the flip side you are willing to not look at Schmidt's
history of getting hurt. He's not going to transform either.
Quote:
I don't know what to make of Bourn and Floyd, but if you are judging them on Bourn's few weeks in the majors and Floyd likely has about 1 year of service tops you are jumping the gun. You are willing to let mediocre players try for years to become players they clearly are not. I've seen way, way, way too much of that over the years here. I ain't buying what you're selling. Dennis


Try for years??? One guy for one full season and the other for a few
weeks.

Scoring runs is not everything. The Phils have been at the top for a
number of years now in run scored and it got them nothing. We need to
improve our defense and pitching. Bourn will help the defense.
Schmidt would help the pitching when he is playing and his price tag is
going to stop you from filling in other problems. Let Myers and Hamels
grow and spend the money elsewhere.

PW

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-05-2006, 03:26 PM
Dennis Dennis is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,130
Default what to do now (long)



On Oct 5, 10:58 am, "Paul W" <pbw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote:
Dennis wrote:
Quote:
Paul W wrote:
Quote:
Dennis wrote: > Paul W wrote:
> > Outfield: Rowand LF, Bourn CF, Victorino RF > That's a HORRIBLE outfield. I can deal with Victorino's production > in center field, but not as a corner outfielder. Rowand does NOT > qualify as a corner outfielder- that's half the production you want. > I've seen NOTHING that indicates Bourn can hit major league > pitching, he's another Roberson as far as I'm concerned. Well we disagree. With all the runs you are scoring you can have non-power guys in the OF. Oh no, we won't be first in Runs Scored and might be 2nd or 3rd? Boo Hoo. The extra defence you get would be very nice and will allow you do depend less on the HR to score. When are you willing to sacrifice runs?For defense which wins baseball games.


You are confusing defense with pitching. Pitching is more than 75% of
runs
being prevented. Hitting is 100% of runs being created.
Quote:
Quote:
Bourn ain't there.He deserves a look and go from there. Going as the 4th outfielder is
fine for me.


Your standards are entirely too low.
Quote:
Quote:
As for Rowand, what choice does he have? He had a below average year for the money he's going to make in 2007. Good luck going somewhere else and getting the same money. Huh? I have no idea what you're trying to say in relation to this conversation.You were the one who said Rowand wouldn't like playing LF. I'm just
saying 'Too Bad.'


I didn't say ANYTHING about him wanting to play LF. I said he doesn't
qualify because
he can't hit like a corner outfielder must. I will accept his offense
IF he is the center fielder,
a FAR more valuable defensive position. We're not talking about Douggie
Glanville here.
Quote:
Quote:
That's great that he's fast an all, but you can't have a one-dimensional player at a corner outfield spot. That's the 2nd biggest offensive position in baseball.That is only a general rule, when you are getting extra runs from
positions that you don't expect it (SS and 2B), you can afford less power.


No, that should be an ADVANTAGE, not a reason to disadvantage yourself.
Quote:
Quote:
It's his first full year in the majors. Give the guy a break. His last full year at AAA with a .310 AVG, .377 OBP, .534 SLG for a .911 OPS doesn't look bad. Did you expect for him to reproduce those numbers in his first year? Give him some time. He only walked 24 times with 415 at-bats this season. Players don't learn plate discipline at 25 years old. He is what he is, he may hit for a higher average, he may get a few more extra base hits, but he's not going to be a .400 OBP leadoff guy that every other team in baseball looks for.

I don't know that and neither do you. Is he your leadoff guy day 1 next season? Likely not, but he could be later on in the season.


I realize that YOU don't know that.
Quote:
Quote:
For as much as we might
Quote:
not like it, the Phils were very successful scoring runs with him there.
Um, Utley and Howard have extraordinary offensive seasons and they don't make the playoffs. Not good enough.

So you think the answer is scoring more runs? Pitching and Defense is what this team needs! This team will score.


With Charlie as manager, they would have to score 900 runs to get to
the
postseason.
Quote:
> > We need to improve the 3 spot and get a lefty if possible. Lieber has > > value (and likely the most value of the group) and you might be able to > > swap Lieber for a better pitcher if you package him with someone else. > > Rowand? Floyd? Other minor league players?
Quote:
> Jason Schmidt Schmidt, is a FA so you can't trade for him and there is NO WAY the Phils are going to pay him the going rate. I never said to trade for him. I know he's a FA. I'm saying that's what I would do and Gillick going after him last offseason gives me reason to believe he's thinking the same thing.

The Phils will not get Jason Schmidt. Just give it up now. He costs too much and his history says he will be hurt.


I'm not saying they WILL get him, I'm giving MY TAKE. WTF?
Quote:
> Moyer can be 5th starter MAYBE, but NO NO NO Floyd or Brito. They suck.
Quote:
Too early to see with Floyd. Floyd has no control. You seem to expect players to transform their careers and become players they are not.No, Floyd has had control and success at every level, until hitting the
majors. I'm not going to give up on him after one full season. However, on the flip side you are willing to not look at Schmidt's history of getting hurt. He's not going to transform either.


He's been healthy enough to start 29 games each of the last *5* seasons
(averaging
more than 200 innings each season), and started 25 games 6 seasons ago.
You know his ERA over the last 5 seasons?

3.35. You know how many Phillies started 29 games, pitched 200 innings
and
had a 3.35 ERA this season? Well, Brett Myers started more than 29
games
but 1 out of 3 is not as good as 3 out of 3. Do you know the last time
a Phillies
pitcher did that? Randy Wolf is 2002. Schmidt would be the best pitcher
on
the team and has NO HISTORY OF MISSING TIME DUE TO INJURY. He has
a history of dominating. 71-38 record in his last 5 seasons.

What is your problem? You are so misinformed that I HAVE to believe you
work for the Phillies. That's what this is about, isn't it?
Quote:
I don't know what to make of Bourn and Floyd, but if you are judging them on Bourn's few weeks in the majors and Floyd likely has about 1 year of service tops you are jumping the gun.
Quote:
You are willing to let mediocre players try for years to become players they clearly are not. I've seen way, way, way too much of that over the years here. I ain't buying what you're selling. DennisTry for years??? One guy for one full season and the other for a few
weeks.


I'm sure Gavin Floyd will get rid of that deer-in-the-headlights look
soon, I'm
sure. He will NEVER have Cole Hamels' poise, and Hamels' is younger.
Bourn is going to learn to hit now?
Quote:
Scoring runs is not everything.


No, just half of everything (in the baseball world)
Quote:
The Phils have been at the top for a number of years now in run scored and it got them nothing.


Because of the other half (pitching + defense) and losing SO MANY 1-run
games. That
doesn't mean TRY to score less runs. WTF kind of logic is that?
Quote:
We need to improve our defense and pitching. Bourn will help the defense. Schmidt would help the pitching when he is playing and his price tag is going to stop you from filling in other problems. Let Myers and Hamels grow and spend the money elsewhere.


Like where??? Not pitching, not outfield, not cather, where do you
propose
money gets spent?

Dennis

Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-07-2006, 03:34 AM
Anthony Graybill Anthony Graybill is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 345
Default what to do now (long)


"Kurt Straub" <jkurtstraub@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:s8KdnVMJxOo3ur7YnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
Quote:
The Phils won 85 games this year. The playoffs are within their grasp with only a few more wins. Heck, three more would have done it this year. The brass should get serious about improving the team, because it's a reachable goal to make the playoffs in 2007. Here's one man's recipe. To my mind, there are only three positions set for next year: 1B, 2B, and SS. Howard, Utley, and Rollins are just fine. We can tinker with just about everything else. Catcher. The Phils are in better shape than you might think. Coste hit .328 after 198 at-bats, so no one can say it was a fluke. Carlos Ruiz improved as the year went on, hitting .261 by the end. We could go with those guys next year and be all right. My preference is to put three catchers on the roster. Bringing back a low-contract Lieberthal would be OK, but adding Johnny Estrada would be even better. Estrada hit .302 last year, says he wants out of Arizona, and wants to come back to Philly. Great, let's get him here! That would also free up Coste to play some 3B if needed.


I've never seen Cost play 3rd base. But if he can defend there respectably,
then I agree with carrrying 3 catcthers. Coste can also pinch hit and spell
Howard in blowout games and against particularly tough lefties. Lieberthal
says that he would come back as a backup, and if he would take less than 1
mill/yr, i'd say let him come back. It would be great to have a backup
catcher who could fill in as a starter if the front line catcher goes on the
DL. Estrada would be welcome here too, but I dont' see how you can have
2-3 starting caliber catchers being happy sharing duty. The key would be
if Coste can get playing time at 3rd or first in addition to catching now
and then or pinch hitting. Ruiz seems to be penciled in as the starting
catcher with Coste his backup. (A platoon of Estrada and Ruiz would be look
good for the rookie catcher in his first full year.)
Phils should get a draft pick for not signing Lieberthal also.

Tony
Quote:
Third Base. Speaking of which, here is the place where the Phils can make their biggest marginal improvement. Abe Nunez plays a fine defensive 3B, but his .211 average means he makes the team as a utility player only. Lucky for us, there are lots of fine third basemen who will potentially be available this off-season. Aramis Ramirez will be a free agent. Love to have him, but if the market is too expensive, let's grab Morgan Ensberg, who is in the doghouse in Houston. Ensberg was slowed by injuries this year, but he was an All-Star in 2005, and still hits a lot of homeruns and walks a lot. His average will bounce back. Other possibilities are the league's leading hitter, Freddy Sanchez, who is a free agent. He has no power, but if you hit .344, that's OK, the Phils have enough HR power elsewhere. Supposedly Blalock will be available, but I'm not that high on him as the others. It would also be great if Miguel Tejada changed his mind and decided that playing 3B was a small price to pay for getting out of Baltimore. There are so many reasonable possibilities, there will be no excuse for not getting something done here for 2007.


I just saw that they intend to have Nunez penciled in as the starting 3rd
baseman for next year. This of course could change at any time. Remember,
defense is a good part of the equation of a winning team. Having a guy who
hits 25 HR but who committs 25 errors at 3rd base would'n't be that great of
an improvement. There are several minor league prospects at 3rd base,
(Cleveland has 2, White Sox, etc, etc. but I think the phils will consider
Amaris Ramirez or I'd like Freddy Sanchez. He did hit 53 doubles this year
and will probably hit 10-15 HR next year and 45 doubles. He only had 6
errors at 3rd also. But it's unknown if the Phils could win the bidding war
for him, but hitting him #2 would be great ahead of Utley and Howard.
Constanzo struggled but showed improvement in Clearwater this year. He'll
probably go to AA next year and it may be a make or break year for him.
Quote:
Center Field. The excellent play of Shane Victorino has made Aaron Rowand expendable. He could be dealt for more pressing needs, like a starting pitcher, or even a left fielder, and let Victorino play center every day. Shane does not have as much power as Rowand, but he hits for a better average and OPS, runs better, throws better, and covers just as much ground in center. Having said that, it's also OK to play Rowand here everyday, if we can't get good value for him in a deal. Right Field. If Rowand stays and plays center, then we can play Victorino in right field every day. He does not have the power you want in a corner outfielder, but otherwise he would be just perfect, and the Phils have enough power elsewhere in the lineup. If Victorino is in center, then we think about a Dellucci/Conine platoon in RF. Left Field. The best solution is to push the magic button and make Pat Burrell revert back to the guy who played in April May and July. The guy who played in August and September was just awful, I hope I never see him again. If the real Pat Burrell won't stand up, and they aren't in RF, then we could consider a platoon of Dellucci and Conine, the chief problem being that Dellucci is a free agent, and says he wants to leave. He may change his mind if he is promised a starting job in LF and enough $$$. If we can sign Dellucci, I'd be fine with sending Burrell off to anyone who will pay his salary.


They should have platooned Burell and Delucci this year, but a platoon of
Delucci/Conine would be fine with me in one of the corner spots. I'd like
to see Burell be healthy for a full year next year, but he seems to be part
head case, so I dont' know if it would matter. Having 100 walks as a goal
could be part of the reason for taking so many called 3rd strikes. How
stupid is that to have as a goal. A batter has to take what he is given,
and until burell causes pitcher to fear him and until he can lay off of the
outside slider, he won't be pitched to like Howard is pitched to.

Victorino did a good enough job in the #2 hole to start if they choose to
leave Rowand go. Rowand has alot of good points, but his strikeout/walk
ratio and strikeout/AB ratio isn't what you want from light/med hitting
outfielder. It would be tough to see him go, but word was that the Whitesox
would take him back and they do have a 3rd base prospect in Joshua Fields
who looks to be a 25 HR type of guy.

I think Bourne could take over the 4th outfielder spot for next year. He
covers ALOT of ground in the OF and if Conine/Delucci are kept on, then they
will need a defensive replacement along with Burell. IF Delucci moves on,
then Rowand will probably be in CF and Victorino/Conine in RF with Bourne or
some other brought in as a 4th/5th outfielder. One has to be very carefull
about sacrificing outfield speed and defense for offensive power. Chasing
one down in the gap can be just as important as hitting a HR. A speedy
outfielder may save as many runs with his defense as compared to a slow
outfielder as the slugging outfielder creates with his bat.

Quote:
Relief Pitching. These guys were dandy through about mid-July, and then like Burrell, fell apart in August and September. It's no mystery why, because the starters could not get into the 6th inning the first half of the year, and Charlie had to overuse his bullpen early, even when it had 7 or 8 guys in it. I think if we can count on the rotation to produce 4 guys who will throw 200 innings, we have the makings of a good bullpen already, to wit: Gordon (R, and closer), Geary (R), Madson (R), Fultz (L), Smith (L) and Castro (L). Yes, six is plenty. Yes, Madson stunk in 2006, but this was mostly when he started and he deserves at least a full year pitching exclusively out of the pen, where he has excelled in the past. Yes, good-bye to the old guys who are now at the end of their ropes or never should have been brought here in the first place: Arthur Rhodes, Rick White, Julio Santana.


The importance of relief pitching was apparently overlooked by Gillick this
year.
Ricke White, Ryan Franklin, Julio Santana, etc.??? Gopher ball pitchers. I
think Arthur Rhodes was a good acquisition, but he may be done, depending on
his arm. Geary really came around and was one of the reasons for the
phils second half surge. Geary did well, as did Smith in the times he
pitched. I've lost confiedence in Fultz but he could easily rebound. It
seems he was pitching with a sore arm part of the time. Madsen needs to
somehow get his pitches down around the knees and get better movement. He
is resilient and able to pitch at any time, so he will probably have a job
again next year. I think he has good stuff, and hopefully he'll learn a
slider or a forkball to go along with fast/curve/change. Fabio Castro will
probably start next year at AAA to get innings under his belt. Probably a
mid-year call up. Gordon will be the closer again next year.

The Mets and the phils scored close to the same number of runs, and towards
the end, the mets/phils had similar starting rotations, but the mets flat
out had the much better bullpen. Phils need to find some guys who can step
in and stop the bleeding for a few innings. Perhaps they need to go and get
a few quality guys. Joe Bisenius made great improvements and throws about
96 so he could be a help next year. Perhaps A.J. Happ or Brian Mazone could
be effective in relief for a year or two while the starting rotation gets
built up around Hamels and Myers. I think Eude Brito will either get a
long look in spring training or else get traded. I dont' think they feel
that he has the repotoir of pitches to do the job in the majors, and what he
sneeks by the hitters in AAA, the big leaguers hit.


Quote:
Starting Pitching. Even more so than leaving men on base, here is the reason why the Phils did not make the playoffs in 2006. Let's not be deceived by the generally good starting pitching we saw in August and September. The Phils got off to a bad start and blew out their bullpen early because from April to July, the starting rotation was just terrible. They gave up a lot of runs and had trouble pitching into the 6th. Things slowly got better as we added Cole Hamels, then got Wolf back, and finally added Jamie Moyer for the stretch choke, er, run. For next year, it will be imperative to add at least one legit starter, a guy who can not only throw 200 innings, but who can *win* some games, say more than 12. Of the present crowd, the only one I'm sure of is Hamels. Brett Myers could be an ace, if he lost about 30 pounds. Let's bring him back, run him to death, and hope for the best. I've lost faith in Jon Lieber, he is too old to get away with carrying his extra 30 pounds, so let's bring him back only if he shows up in the Spring with a new and fit body--- a real long shot. The team has invested a lot in Wolf, and pitchers usually pitch their best the year after coming back from Tommy John story, so it's probably a good gamble to bring him back with a new contract. Jamie Moyer is not the answer- he will be 44 next year, and he wants to go back to Seattle, anyway. There is no point in counting on Gavin Floyd or Eude Brito, anything they contribute would be an unexpected surprise. Let's face it, we will need at least one, and preferably two, new starting pitchers if the Phils want to seriously improve for 2007. It won't be easy. Here's where dealing Rowand might make the most sense. ----- Kurt Straub


I dont' think that Phils will be able to outbid the Yanks or Mets, but I
think Jason Schmidt would be a free agent this year.
He would do fine along with Hamels and Myers. When we look around at the
teams who are 'pitching rich', usually they want to stay that way. Thus the
phils may be best to continue to draft quality pitching and to build at
least that part of their arsenal through their farm system. Face it, if
they would have had a 20 game winner and a 17 game winner along with Myers,
Hamels and Leiber/Wolf, they would have been in the playoffs and been in a
good race with the mets for the division crown. Pitching is what wins
ballgames and pennants. Phils need to improve that part of the team and
not loose too much from the offensive end. They need to improve the bullpen
and get at least one major quality arm for the rotation.

TonyG



Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-07-2006, 05:55 AM
Mike Mike is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 186
Default what to do now (long)

"TonyG" <agraybill71460@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:NeFVg.6012$Y24.2393@newsread4.news.pas.earthl ink.net...
Quote:
"Kurt Straub" <jkurtstraub@comcast.net> wrote in message news:s8KdnVMJxOo3ur7YnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
Quote:
Catcher. The Phils are in better shape than you might think. Coste hit .328 after 198 at-bats, so no one can say it was a fluke. Carlos Ruiz improved as the year went on, hitting .261 by the end. We could go with those guys next year and be all right. My preference is to put three catchers on the roster. Bringing back a low-contract Lieberthal would be OK, but adding Johnny Estrada would be even better. Estrada hit .302

last
Quote:
year, says he wants out of Arizona, and wants to come back to Philly. Great, let's get him here! That would also free up Coste to play some 3B if needed. I've never seen Cost play 3rd base. But if he can defend there

respectably,
Quote:
then I agree with carrrying 3 catcthers. Coste can also pinch hit and

spell
Quote:
Howard in blowout games and against particularly tough lefties.

Lieberthal
Quote:
says that he would come back as a backup, and if he would take less than 1 mill/yr, i'd say let him come back. It would be great to have a backup catcher who could fill in as a starter if the front line catcher goes on

the
Quote:
DL. Estrada would be welcome here too, but I dont' see how you can have 2-3 starting caliber catchers being happy sharing duty. The key would

be
Quote:
if Coste can get playing time at 3rd or first in addition to catching now and then or pinch hitting. Ruiz seems to be penciled in as the starting catcher with Coste his backup. (A platoon of Estrada and Ruiz would be

look
Quote:
good for the rookie catcher in his first full year.) Phils should get a draft pick for not signing Lieberthal also.



I'd pass on Estrada. He'll be 31, that's getting a bit old in "catcher
years". He's not that good offensively (too many DP's, little power, slow,
never walks). Lieberthal actually had a slightly better year than Estrada.
Estrada really had only one good year, with the rest being somewhat
mediocre. And considering his teammates publicly criticized his desire, I'd
say "pass".



Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:34 PM.


MyLounge.com Site Map
Forum: Cars, Cell Phone, Database, Games, Home Improvement, IT, Music, School, Sports, Web Design, Web Server, Weight Loss

The MyLounge.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for any advice. The information contained on MyLounge.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of MyLounge.com. MyLounge.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of MyLounge.com Term of Service

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.