On 2006-10-05 19:41:43 -0600, Fistpout Trebuchet <humehnity@example.com> said:


I do appreciate all the mental prowess applied. Skipping over how we
got there for obvious reasons, I'll happily accept a number somewhere
*between 1k and 2k* for possible lineups now bouncing around
dangerously inside Skiles brain.

Using nothing other than cave man calculus, that's enough lineups to
introduce a wobble in Skiles mental trajectory serious enough to wear
his CV joints out pretty quick.

Skiles has already strained within the bounds of convention, running
3PG, a SF, and whatever Sweet Knees is. Or maybe I just imagined that
lineup last season...

Generally though, the players like to know where they are supposed to
be on the court...right?

Or are we embarking on a whole new paradigm of position-less bball?
Going beyond the triangle to the pentangle?
Perpetual motion offense?
Beyond man to man, beyond zone, to the quantum matchup?

In alt.sports.basketball.nba.chicago-bulls on Thu, 05 Oct 2006 03:11:20 GMT
Granville Waiters' Ghost wrote:



As long as you don't mention my name for googling purposes, it should be
cool that I contribute occasionally -- not as much as before, since I have a
real job and everything. But for the record, I haven't heard anything about
the Bulls that might interest anyone here, but I have some dirt on the
Nuggets that would leave you writhing on the ground helplessly in
schadenfreude. Abg ernyyl. Gurl'er xrrcvat zr zbfgyl bhg bs gur qveg ybbc.

In article <a1tci2dkgug238bvfhkkjddii5m9sip1e2@4ax.com>,
Fistpout Trebuchet <humehnity@example.com> wrote:



Pbby, fnl ab zber. :-)