On 8 Oct 2006 08:19:02 -0700, "giantforever" <t_marovich@hotmail.com>
wrote:


No, just somebody who pays attention to the minors - and the Giant
minor league system is seriously short on quality position prospects.
Just the fact that you seemed even mildly excited about Linden shows
that.

On 8 Oct 2006 08:16:36 -0700, "giantforever" <t_marovich@hotmail.com>
wrote:


Explains the 0 for San Francisco success rate.

Ima Pseudonym wrote:

There you go again, living in the past. Good for history books, not
good for the future. Hey, if the Red Sox and White Sox can do it, we
can too....lol. But, I'm sure the Baseball Gods are looking towards
the Cubs first. But, we're next in line......lol

On 8 Oct 2006 08:51:23 -0700, "giantforever" <t_marovich@hotmail.com>
wrote:


Funny you talk about living in the past - when you are the one who
brought up Dodger troubles in winning post season games.

Over the next few seasons at least it's far more likely for the
Dodgers to change that than for the Giants to do so - since the
Dodgers are the better team now, significantly younger than the
Giants, with every commentator on the minors saying that the Dodger
minor league system is currently far better than the Giants - oh, and
with more payroll room to boot.

On 8 Oct 2006 08:19:02 -0700, "giantforever" <t_marovich@hotmail.com>
wrote:

You're all excited about a Giant team that even you don't know who it
will contain next year?

Not that the Dodgers have any more stability, heck, we don't even put
the players' names on the jerseys.

J.

"giantforever" <t_marovich@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1160320994.582886.22160@c28g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...

so basically you are more a fan of hating the dodgers than you are a fan of
loving the giants. That's the difference. I too dislike the giants and am
happy when they finish behind us but I don't get any joy out of going into
their NG and tweaking them about the teams short comings (no points for the
easy ones). I am too busy rooting for my own team.
AG

"giantforever" <t_marovich@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1160322683.162207.219000@k70g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...

How are the odds in your favor? Talk about living in the past. Because the
Giants have gone further before failing in the past you figure they have a
better shot? The fell WAY WAY short this past year. You have to make it to
the post season donchuknow. So lets live in the very recent past. Dodger
post season berths 1, Giants 0. Hows that for not living in the past.

What I was actually refering to is the current make up of the teams. You
have a bunch of aging veterans on their way out and no replacements except
what they can buy. We have a bunch of injured veterans possibly on their
way out but a bunch of very good minor league prospects. In other words,
our holes are a lot smaller than yours. So yeah, go back to the phone booth
and we will see who gets there first.

AG

AguaGirl wrote:

Not sure where that comes from, oh yeah, another know-it-all Dodger
fan. Just because of posting numbers on NG's? You're a lost puppy, AG.

"giantforever" <t_marovich@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1160332732.029992.322050@b28g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com...

It comes from your own post "... the Giants NG, but I put in my two cents
once in a while, it's just
more fun playing with you guys and your lame posts, ........ you said you
don't post much there because its more fun to rag on the Dodger fans. You
enjoy dissing the Dodgers more than you enjoy discussing your own team. I
am not lost gint boy.... You paint a perfectly clear picture.

AG