![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don Tootin' wrote:
Quote:
Maybe there was more than 1 reason? : ) Just a hint, you can always try OB, but don't forget to have a coke spoon necklace. ; ) Go Pads ! |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Oh, come on now. Nady has demonstrated that he's a .260 hitter who will max out at 18-20 homers while playing brutal defense in the outfield. We realized it after a couple years, and the Mets realized it after a couple months when they dumped him on the Pirates. Mike Cameron is more valuable to this team than five Xavier Nadys would have been. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Well played. I just got my tetanus shot a couple months back...it should be safe. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
I stand corrected. I didn't mean I didn't wan't Cameron or think that
Nady was better than Cameron. Cameron is a great fit as well as Roberts. Giles is the guy that has to go sense his power numbers are way down. Dano badlands420 wrote: Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
We're not likely to find a taker with the amount of money he's owed over the next two years. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dano" <dcashmere@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1160521122.233740.255630@e3g2000cwe.googlegro ups.com... Quote:
Giles did have a horrible year power-wise. However, his OBP is still damned good, and since that fits in nicely with the Alderson philosophy of how to build a team, I doubt Giles will be going anywhere. It would surprise me if his power wasn't improved next year over this year... I don't expect him to ever be back to his power numbers from his prime years, but I think this past season was the aberration, not what will be his norm. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|