Sports Forums  

Go Back   Sports Forums > Soccer > Chelsea
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-02-2006, 09:08 AM
John Shocked John Shocked is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 282
Default Beckham - Simeone WC 1998 -- Red Card Without Substitution ? #2

It is simply incredible that the outcome of a World Cup Finals
match, watched worldwide by Billions of people, could be
Decided by such a trivial act as that which Beckham
commits on this tape.

But even more stunning and suspicious, is the failure of the UK
Press to respond to this outrage by an investigation of the Referee
in question and Beckham himself, to see if either one or both had
been commissioned by Organized Crime Gambling division
interests to Fix this match.

With the UK Media controlled by Rupert Murdoch, who by this time
was operating a huge Gambling empire, there was likely
no way that the UK media was about to focus on the obvious
threat to the sport of World Soccer.

John

=============================================
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwIL4Bs5dgE

I am interested to hear how such a mild tap on the as Beckham gave
to Simeone could result in a Red Card.
Watching this in the US, which at the time was not seeing a lot
of world soccer, I was amazed that the UK press did not
attack this referee for ruining this match unnecessarily.

Maybe a yellow, if the Referee is determined to make a point.
And if this is really normal in the World soccer theater,
then it has to be a Red Card With Substitution.
This sort of wreckage of the Sport of an major soccer match
by reducing one of the teams to 10 men on what here must be some
kind of technicality, must be eradicated from the sport.

One would have expected the world press to have descended on
this Referee and Beckham, to ferret out whether this scenario
to have Beckham sent off was planned, based on both the Referee
and Beckham being under the control of Organized Crime Gambling
division elements.
How many people can even name this referee right now.

Allowing a Referee to commit a Sent Off Without Substitution
in mild situations like this and punish a team by reducing them to 10 men
invites bribery corruption into world soccer from Organized Crime
Gambling interests.
Eradicating this threat to the sport by forcing the referee to at least
commit a Sent Off With Substitution should protect the sport
from bribes a mockeries of soccer as this match became, 10 men to 11.

John




Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-02-2006, 09:18 AM
Henry Norris Henry Norris is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 153
Default Beckham - Simeone WC 1998 -- Red Card Without Substitution ? #2

I you sure your name isn't really John Delayedreaction?

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-02-2006, 09:23 AM
John Shocked John Shocked is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 282
Default Beckham - Simeone WC 1998 -- Red Card Without Substitution ? #2

"Henry Norris" <Nechesh@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:1157188721.946535.50460@m79g2000cwm.googlegro ups.com...
Quote:
I you sure your name isn't really John Delayedreaction?


Point being ?

John

===============================================
It is simply incredible that the outcome of a World Cup Finals
match, watched worldwide by Billions of people, could be
Decided by such a trivial act as that which Beckham
commits on this tape.

But even more stunning and suspicious, is the failure of the UK
Press to respond to this outrage by an investigation of the Referee
in question and Beckham himself, to see if either one or both had
been commissioned by Organized Crime Gambling division
interests to Fix this match.

With the UK Media controlled by Rupert Murdoch, who by this time
was operating a huge Gambling empire, there was likely
no way that the UK media was about to focus on the obvious
threat to the sport of World Soccer.

John

=============================================
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwIL4Bs5dgE

I am interested to hear how such a mild tap on the as Beckham gave
to Simeone could result in a Red Card.
Watching this in the US, which at the time was not seeing a lot
of world soccer, I was amazed that the UK press did not
attack this referee for ruining this match unnecessarily.

Maybe a yellow, if the Referee is determined to make a point.
And if this is really normal in the World soccer theater,
then it has to be a Red Card With Substitution.
This sort of wreckage of the Sport of an major soccer match
by reducing one of the teams to 10 men on what here must be some
kind of technicality, must be eradicated from the sport.

One would have expected the world press to have descended on
this Referee and Beckham, to ferret out whether this scenario
to have Beckham sent off was planned, based on both the Referee
and Beckham being under the control of Organized Crime Gambling
division elements.
How many people can even name this referee right now.

Allowing a Referee to commit a Sent Off Without Substitution
in mild situations like this and punish a team by reducing them to 10 men
invites bribery corruption into world soccer from Organized Crime
Gambling interests.
Eradicating this threat to the sport by forcing the referee to at least
commit a Sent Off With Substitution should protect the sport
from bribes a mockeries of soccer as this match became, 10 men to 11.

John


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-02-2006, 09:26 AM
Niel Humphreys Niel Humphreys is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 93
Default Beckham - Simeone WC 1998 -- Red Card Without Substitution ? #2

"John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:P4cKg.18499$RD.12036@fed1read08...
Quote:
"Henry Norris" <Nechesh@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:1157188721.946535.50460@m79g2000cwm.googlegro ups.com...
Quote:
I you sure your name isn't really John Delayedreaction?
Point being ? John



Whooosh
--

Niel H


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-02-2006, 09:30 AM
John Shocked John Shocked is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 282
Default Beckham - Simeone WC 1998 -- Red Card Without Substitution ? #2

"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in message news:46mdnVFGJt_802TZRVnygg@pipex.net...
Quote:
"John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:P4cKg.18499$RD.12036@fed1read08...
Quote:
"Henry Norris" <Nechesh@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:1157188721.946535.50460@m79g2000cwm.googlegro ups.com...
Quote:
I you sure your name isn't really John Delayedreaction?
Point being ? John
Whooosh Niel H


Erudite public relations firm response.

John

==============================================
It is simply incredible that the outcome of a World Cup Finals
match, watched worldwide by Billions of people, could be
Decided by such a trivial act as that which Beckham
commits on this tape.

But even more stunning and suspicious, is the failure of the UK
Press to respond to this outrage by an investigation of the Referee
in question and Beckham himself, to see if either one or both had
been commissioned by Organized Crime Gambling division
interests to Fix this match.

With the UK Media controlled by Rupert Murdoch, who by this time
was operating a huge Gambling empire, there was likely
no way that the UK media was about to focus on the obvious
threat to the sport of World Soccer.

John

=============================================
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwIL4Bs5dgE

I am interested to hear how such a mild tap on the as Beckham gave
to Simeone could result in a Red Card.
Watching this in the US, which at the time was not seeing a lot
of world soccer, I was amazed that the UK press did not
attack this referee for ruining this match unnecessarily.

Maybe a yellow, if the Referee is determined to make a point.
And if this is really normal in the World soccer theater,
then it has to be a Red Card With Substitution.
This sort of wreckage of the Sport of an major soccer match
by reducing one of the teams to 10 men on what here must be some
kind of technicality, must be eradicated from the sport.

One would have expected the world press to have descended on
this Referee and Beckham, to ferret out whether this scenario
to have Beckham sent off was planned, based on both the Referee
and Beckham being under the control of Organized Crime Gambling
division elements.
How many people can even name this referee right now.

Allowing a Referee to commit a Sent Off Without Substitution
in mild situations like this and punish a team by reducing them to 10 men
invites bribery corruption into world soccer from Organized Crime
Gambling interests.
Eradicating this threat to the sport by forcing the referee to at least
commit a Sent Off With Substitution should protect the sport
from bribes a mockeries of soccer as this match became, 10 men to 11.
=============================================

John


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-02-2006, 10:05 AM
Niel Humphreys Niel Humphreys is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 93
Default Beckham - Simeone WC 1998 -- Red Card Without Substitution ? #2

"John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cbcKg.18500$RD.9817@fed1read08...
Quote:
"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in message news:46mdnVFGJt_802TZRVnygg@pipex.net...
Quote:
"John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:P4cKg.18499$RD.12036@fed1read08...
Quote:
"Henry Norris" <Nechesh@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:1157188721.946535.50460@m79g2000cwm.googlegro ups.com...>I you sure your name isn't really John Delayedreaction? Point being ? John
Whooosh Niel H
Erudite public relations firm response. John



<sigh> I keep forgetting that Americans have no sense of irony so let me
spell it out in small words for you.

You commented on an instance that occured over 4 years ago. Henry made an
ironic reference asking whether your name was 'delayedreaction' in reference
to the *delay* of over 4 years before your *reaction* to the incident you
are referring to in your paranoid ranting post - which may be quite amusing
in itself but I fear you are being serious seeing as you obviously don't
have a sense of humour.

--

Niel H


Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-02-2006, 10:11 AM
John Shocked John Shocked is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 282
Default Beckham - Simeone WC 1998 -- Red Card Without Substitution ? #2

"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in message news:CJydnSiNu_vwymTZRVnysA@pipex.net...
Quote:
"John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cbcKg.18500$RD.9817@fed1read08...
Quote:
"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in message news:46mdnVFGJt_802TZRVnygg@pipex.net...
Quote:
"John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:P4cKg.18499$RD.12036@fed1read08...> "Henry Norris" <Nechesh@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:1157188721.946535.50460@m79g2000cwm.googlegro ups.com...>>I you sure your name isn't really John Delayedreaction?> Point being ?> John Whooosh Niel H
Erudite public relations firm response. John
<sigh> I keep forgetting that Americans have no sense of irony so let me spell it out in small words for you. You commented on an instance that occured over 4 years ago. Henry made an ironic reference asking whether your name was 'delayedreaction' in reference to the *delay* of over 4 years before your *reaction* to the incident you are referring to in your paranoid ranting post - which may be quite amusing in itself but I fear you are being serious seeing as you obviously don't have a sense of humour. Niel H


If he is that interested in forcing his comedy on others,
he ought to try something like alt.comedy .
I am sure they would love to hear that over there.
Here, the subject is soccer, and specifically in this thread
the failure of the UK Press to respond with scrutiny when
Organized Crime Gambling bribery corruption ousted England
from the World Cup Finals 1998.

John


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-02-2006, 10:46 AM
Niel Humphreys Niel Humphreys is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 93
Default Beckham - Simeone WC 1998 -- Red Card Without Substitution ? #2

"John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MNcKg.18503$RD.3202@fed1read08...
Quote:
"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in message news:CJydnSiNu_vwymTZRVnysA@pipex.net...
Quote:
"John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cbcKg.18500$RD.9817@fed1read08...
Quote:
"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in message news:46mdnVFGJt_802TZRVnygg@pipex.net...> "John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote in message> news:P4cKg.18499$RD.12036@fed1read08...>> "Henry Norris" <Nechesh@googlemail.com> wrote in message>> news:1157188721.946535.50460@m79g2000cwm.googlegro ups.com...>>>I you sure your name isn't really John Delayedreaction?>> Point being ?>> John> Whooosh> Niel H Erudite public relations firm response. John
<sigh> I keep forgetting that Americans have no sense of irony so let me spell it out in small words for you. You commented on an instance that occured over 4 years ago. Henry made an ironic reference asking whether your name was 'delayedreaction' in reference to the *delay* of over 4 years before your *reaction* to the incident you are referring to in your paranoid ranting post - which may be quite amusing in itself but I fear you are being serious seeing as you obviously don't have a sense of humour. Niel H
If he is that interested in forcing his comedy on others, he ought to try something like alt.comedy . I am sure they would love to hear that over there. Here, the subject is soccer, and specifically in this thread the failure of the UK Press to respond with scrutiny when Organized Crime Gambling bribery corruption ousted England from the World Cup Finals 1998. John



The subject Soccer - correct
The subject of conspiracy theories - incorrect - fuck off to alt.conspiracy
or alt.paranoid please.
--

Niel H


Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-02-2006, 10:52 AM
John Shocked John Shocked is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 282
Default Beckham - Simeone WC 1998 -- Red Card Without Substitution ? #2

"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in message news:8ZGdnSurgJtm_WTZRVnyrw@pipex.net...
Quote:
"John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:MNcKg.18503$RD.3202@fed1read08...
Quote:
"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in message news:CJydnSiNu_vwymTZRVnysA@pipex.net...
Quote:
"John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cbcKg.18500$RD.9817@fed1read08...> "Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in message news:46mdnVFGJt_802TZRVnygg@pipex.net...>> "John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:P4cKg.18499$RD.12036@fed1read08...>>> "Henry Norris" <Nechesh@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:1157188721.946535.50460@m79g2000cwm.googlegro ups.com...>>>>I you sure your name isn't really John Delayedreaction?>>> Point being ?>>> John>> Whooosh>> Niel H> Erudite public relations firm response.> John <sigh> I keep forgetting that Americans have no sense of irony so let me spell it out in small words for you. You commented on an instance that occured over 4 years ago. Henry made an ironic reference asking whether your name was 'delayedreaction' in reference to the *delay* of over 4 years before your *reaction* to the incident you are referring to in your paranoid ranting post - which may be quite amusing in itself but I fear you are being serious seeing as you obviously don't have a sense of humour. Niel H
If he is that interested in forcing his comedy on others, he ought to try something like alt.comedy . I am sure they would love to hear that over there. Here, the subject is soccer, and specifically in this thread the failure of the UK Press to respond with scrutiny when Organized Crime Gambling bribery corruption ousted England from the World Cup Finals 1998. John
The subject Soccer - correct The subject of conspiracy theories - incorrect - fuck off to alt.conspiracy or alt.paranoid please. Niel H


Of course that is the response of a Public relations firm
working to defend Rupert Murdoch and other media barons
involved in Organized Crime Gambling in the UK.

Your job is to come here, pose as a soccer fan, and claim
that your repudiation of the obvious corruption evidence which
has resulted in the England team being bounced 3 times in a row
on spurious grounds as a 'conspiracy theory'.

The term "conspiracy theory" was thought up by PR firms.
It is their prime job to deflect public attention away from them,
to the other muck whioch is on TV nowadays.

John


Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-02-2006, 10:55 AM
Niel Humphreys Niel Humphreys is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 93
Default Beckham - Simeone WC 1998 -- Red Card Without Substitution ? #2

"John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8odKg.18505$RD.10440@fed1read08...
Quote:
"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in message news:8ZGdnSurgJtm_WTZRVnyrw@pipex.net...
Quote:
"John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:MNcKg.18503$RD.3202@fed1read08...
Quote:
"Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote in message news:CJydnSiNu_vwymTZRVnysA@pipex.net...> "John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote in message> news:cbcKg.18500$RD.9817@fed1read08...>> "Niel Humphreys" <admin@sznzozwzdzoznzczozmzpzuztzezrzs.co.uk> wrote>> in message news:46mdnVFGJt_802TZRVnygg@pipex.net...>>> "John Shocked" <jshocked@hotmail.com> wrote in message>>> news:P4cKg.18499$RD.12036@fed1read08...>>>> "Henry Norris" <Nechesh@googlemail.com> wrote in message>>>> news:1157188721.946535.50460@m79g2000cwm.googlegro ups.com...>>>>>I you sure your name isn't really John Delayedreaction?>>>> Point being ?>>>> John>>> Whooosh>>> Niel H>> Erudite public relations firm response.>> John> <sigh> I keep forgetting that Americans have no sense of irony so let> me spell it out in small words for you.> You commented on an instance that occured over 4 years ago. Henry made> an ironic reference asking whether your name was 'delayedreaction' in> reference to the *delay* of over 4 years before your *reaction* to the> incident you are referring to in your paranoid ranting post - which may> be quite amusing in itself but I fear you are being serious seeing as> you obviously don't have a sense of humour.> Niel H If he is that interested in forcing his comedy on others, he ought to try something like alt.comedy . I am sure they would love to hear that over there. Here, the subject is soccer, and specifically in this thread the failure of the UK Press to respond with scrutiny when Organized Crime Gambling bribery corruption ousted England from the World Cup Finals 1998. John
The subject Soccer - correct The subject of conspiracy theories - incorrect - fuck off to alt.conspiracy or alt.paranoid please. Niel H
Of course that is the response of a Public relations firm working to defend Rupert Murdoch and other media barons involved in Organized Crime Gambling in the UK. Your job is to come here, pose as a soccer fan, and claim that your repudiation of the obvious corruption evidence which has resulted in the England team being bounced 3 times in a row on spurious grounds as a 'conspiracy theory'. The term "conspiracy theory" was thought up by PR firms. It is their prime job to deflect public attention away from them, to the other muck whioch is on TV nowadays.



As Scoopex would say "PMSL".
--

Niel H


Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:39 PM.


MyLounge.com Site Map
Forum: Cars, Cell Phone, Database, Games, Home Improvement, IT, Music, School, Sports, Web Design, Web Server, Weight Loss

The MyLounge.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for any advice. The information contained on MyLounge.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of MyLounge.com. MyLounge.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of MyLounge.com Term of Service

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.