It's seems like Chelsea have twisted the words of Gallas. CFC are
saying that he 'threatened to score an own goal'. That just isn't the
case! The point he was making is that if he'd refused to play then it
would be unfair to fine him as it is better him not playing altogether
than his taking part and not putting his heart into it and getting paid
for this without a fine. The 'scoring an own goal' is merely an
illustration to emphasize a point.

Why do Chelsea owe their supporters an explanation anyhow? Why not just
get on with things?! Chelsea were the ones to break the rules by
meeting with Ashley Cole and now that someone has stood up for himself
they get upset.

What goes around comes around Mr Mourinho!

"Tyler" <tylerhalifax@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1157412400.530153.256750@p79g2000cwp.googlegr oups.com...

They can't afford to lose any, I just couldn't stand the hassle at Victoria.

I hope someone just bombs the club.

Tyler wrote:

Why explain his threat away? I think it was a wonderful threat,
actually. Really pissed them off. a

Ian Harvey wrote:
|| "Tyler" <tylerhalifax@hotmail.com> wrote in message
|| news:1157412400.530153.256750@p79g2000cwp.googlegr oups.com...
||| It's seems like Chelsea have twisted the words of Gallas. CFC are
||| saying that he 'threatened to score an own goal'. That just isn't
||| the case! The point he was making is that if he'd refused to play
||| then it would be unfair to fine him as it is better him not playing
||| altogether than his taking part and not putting his heart into it
||| and getting paid for this without a fine. The 'scoring an own goal'
||| is merely an illustration to emphasize a point.
|||
||| Why do Chelsea owe their supporters an explanation anyhow?
||
|| They can't afford to lose any, I just couldn't stand the hassle at
|| Victoria.

By all accounts they pack Paddington out on their way back to Reading. That
will be expensive following two teams in the Premiership will it not.

--
"A horse a horse my kingdom for a horse, I haven't had a winner in six
months".

MD

"Tyler" <tylerhalifax@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1157412400.530153.256750@p79g2000cwp.googlegr oups.com...

It really is a matter between employer and employee. If he said these
things in the heat of the moment, he should have been brought back in a few
days later and asked to explain his comments. If he retracted them, he can
be reminded of the disciplinary procedures of the club. If he stood by
them, he should have faced a discuplinary hearing for misconduct, and fined
if found guilty.

What he said was a private matter between the employer and the employee. If
he said it and meant it, he's a bit of a cunt, but Mourinho is alleged to
have been happy to see him rot for a year. If Mourinho said that, he's also
a cunt. Maybe Gallas said that in retaliation to an inference that he'd
spend 12 months in the reserves?

Either way, Chelsea have come out of it looking like they always do, lacking
in class.

Craig

"Craig Wynne" <nochance@here.com> wrote in message
news:Xr-dnSbYM-tG_WDZRVnygQ@bt.com...
few
can
fined
If
also
lacking

And a bunch Cunts

> What he said was a private matter between the employer and the employee.
If
also

Indeed!

lacking

Indeed!


--
MESSAGE ENDS.
John Porcella

aaa wrote:

They just want to give Gallas a bad name now that he is a Gunner - up
until now (as a Chelsea player) he was supposedly well behaved.

Tyler wrote:


Take with a pinch of salt. Chesea take after their lead(JM) an are a
theatric lot.