![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Slam magazine takes a look at the worst NBA front offices:
http://slamonline.com/online/2006/0...-front-offices/ Yep, our man McHale's number one. Jim Welters |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Welters wrote:
Quote:
Woo! Woo! And McHale hires such great people to help him too: http://raptors.fan.ca/index.php/arc...n-incompetence/ |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
In alt.sports.basketball.nba.mn-wolves on 21 Sep 2006 05:29:51 -0700 levi
wrote: Quote:
Babcock got a bad rap for two things: drafting Araujo and trading Vince. Grating that both of those things were major blunders -- and not necessarily only in retrospect -- his overall record in Toronto was about .500: Raps fans tend to forget that Babcock was the guy who cleared the ton of cap space that allowed Colangelo to do his thing this off-season, that Babcock was the guy who engineered the Jalen Rose trade, and that Babcock was the one who drafted Villanueva with the 7th pick. He had a two-year plan to clear salaries, and he did that perfectly, even including the horrible Alonzo Mourning situation. Babcock is not as big an idiot as he is often portrayed. (Oddly, no one seems to blame Babcock for hiring, and keeping, Sam Mitchell as coach, something I think is his biggest mistake by far.) |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fistpout Trebuchet wrote:
Quote:
Here in Minnesota, we all think Sam's a pretty good guy. I'm not sure if he's NBA head coach material, so, yes, making Sam HC (with no previous experience) is most likely a mistake, but Babcock's biggest? Wow. Here's a link to a little indepth on Rob: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Babcock Not a guy I would look to hire. But hey, the Wolves are probably going to be in on the bad end of a few more lopsided trades. Who better than Babcock, loser in the "most lopsided trade in NBA history" to have on board as designated patsy? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
luke witte has a wiki entry, but corky "the knee" taylor doesn't. wierd. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Welters wrote: Quote:
Remember the good old days when I would say McHale sucks and everyone would bash me for it? I wish there was some satisfaction in watching everyone eat crow, but there just isn't. Matt |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Matt wrote:
Quote:
Good on ya, Matt. I reviewed some of your invective from years past and it still sticks to the wall. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
levi wrote: Quote:
The thing that puzzles me is Glen Taylor's loyalty to McHale. If McHale performed like this managing any of Taylors other businesses, it's hard to believe he'd leave him in place. I'm sure Glen wouldn't fire him, he'd find a lesser position for him, and ease him into an area of competence that couldn't hurt Glen's business, or his other employees. Surely Taylor, an intelligent man, has read or heard of the Peter principle? Enough is enough. If McHale doesn't step asside willingly, he needs to be shoved. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Andy H wrote:
Quote:
That KG turned out to be such a great player has IMO, the main thing that has kept McHale employed for so long. What Taylor's "loyalty" strongly suggests to me is that the Wolves ownership is not passionately interested in vying for a championship, it is really just trying to achieve a profit. Just keep the salaries in line, get enough sheeple coming in to support the team, along with advertising revenues, etc. KG is the lynchpin of this "strategy". He is why people are interested in watching the Wolves. Sure, Taylor spent some $7M on a scoreboard, seats, and a restaurant (while us taxpayers ponied up a matching $7M to get-r-done), but that's peanuts, really. I believe that the "big" payoff for Taylor comes from the increasing value of the team. There are other ways to profit, as in tax writeoffs, even if the team "loses" money. Even so, Taylor and his partners get to live the high life as VIPs within the NBA - there is an ego thing too. If it wasn't for the fabulous money that KG takes home, I'd feel very sad, perhaps even angered at the exploitation of his talent. As it stands, I can only shrug that such a great player (and person, IMO) has been "wasted" and not given the support necessary to compete for a championship. All things considered, the NBA is simply entertainment. And the Wolves are really just a soap opera. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
One of the ESPN.com writers made the same point about McHale that you did.
The only way McHale keeps his job is that he's doing the boss's will. As I told the Wolves ticket guy who called to find out why I cancelled my season tickets after 10 seasons, "I just don't get the feeling that the team management knows how to build a winning team, or they don't really care to." The Wolves are much more valuable with Garnett than without. Is it any coincidence that there were rumors this year about somebody buying 30% of the team, displacing some of the minority owners? Jim Welters in article 1159274637.003771.266420@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups. com, levi at levi@visi.com wrote on 9/26/06 7:43 AM: Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|