Sports Forums  

Go Back   Sports Forums > Basketball > Minnesotta Timberwolves
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-20-2006, 08:33 PM
Jim Welters Jim Welters is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6
Default Worst front offices

Slam magazine takes a look at the worst NBA front offices:

http://slamonline.com/online/2006/0...-front-offices/

Yep, our man McHale's number one.

Jim Welters

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-21-2006, 12:29 PM
levi levi is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 381
Default Worst front offices

Jim Welters wrote:
Quote:
Slam magazine takes a look at the worst NBA front offices: http://slamonline.com/online/2006/0...-front-offices/ Yep, our man McHale's number one. Jim Welters


Woo! Woo!

And McHale hires such great people to help him too:

http://raptors.fan.ca/index.php/arc...n-incompetence/

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-21-2006, 01:30 PM
Fistpout Trebuchet Fistpout Trebuchet is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 39
Default Worst front offices

In alt.sports.basketball.nba.mn-wolves on 21 Sep 2006 05:29:51 -0700 levi
wrote:
Quote:
Jim Welters wrote:
Quote:
Slam magazine takes a look at the worst NBA front offices: http://slamonline.com/online/2006/0...-front-offices/ Yep, our man McHale's number one. Jim Welters
Woo! Woo!And McHale hires such great people to help him too:http://raptors.fan.ca/index.php/arc...n-incompetence/


Babcock got a bad rap for two things: drafting Araujo and trading Vince.
Grating that both of those things were major blunders -- and not necessarily
only in retrospect -- his overall record in Toronto was about .500: Raps
fans tend to forget that Babcock was the guy who cleared the ton of cap
space that allowed Colangelo to do his thing this off-season, that Babcock
was the guy who engineered the Jalen Rose trade, and that Babcock was the
one who drafted Villanueva with the 7th pick. He had a two-year plan to
clear salaries, and he did that perfectly, even including the horrible
Alonzo Mourning situation. Babcock is not as big an idiot as he is often
portrayed.

(Oddly, no one seems to blame Babcock for hiring, and keeping, Sam Mitchell
as coach, something I think is his biggest mistake by far.)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-21-2006, 02:33 PM
levi levi is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 381
Default Worst front offices

Fistpout Trebuchet wrote:
Quote:
In alt.sports.basketball.nba.mn-wolves on 21 Sep 2006 05:29:51 -0700 levi wrote:
Quote:
Jim Welters wrote:
Quote:
Slam magazine takes a look at the worst NBA front offices: http://slamonline.com/online/2006/0...-front-offices/ Yep, our man McHale's number one. Jim Welters
Woo! Woo!And McHale hires such great people to help him too:http://raptors.fan.ca/index.php/arc...n-incompetence/
Babcock got a bad rap for two things: drafting Araujo and trading Vince. Grating that both of those things were major blunders -- and not necessarily only in retrospect -- his overall record in Toronto was about .500: Raps fans tend to forget that Babcock was the guy who cleared the ton of cap space that allowed Colangelo to do his thing this off-season, that Babcock was the guy who engineered the Jalen Rose trade, and that Babcock was the one who drafted Villanueva with the 7th pick. He had a two-year plan to clear salaries, and he did that perfectly, even including the horrible Alonzo Mourning situation. Babcock is not as big an idiot as he is often portrayed. (Oddly, no one seems to blame Babcock for hiring, and keeping, Sam Mitchell as coach, something I think is his biggest mistake by far.)


Here in Minnesota, we all think Sam's a pretty good guy.
I'm not sure if he's NBA head coach material, so, yes,
making Sam HC (with no previous experience) is most
likely a mistake, but Babcock's biggest? Wow.

Here's a link to a little indepth on Rob:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Babcock

Not a guy I would look to hire. But hey, the Wolves
are probably going to be in on the bad end of a few
more lopsided trades. Who better than Babcock,
loser in the "most lopsided trade in NBA history"
to have on board as designated patsy?

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-22-2006, 05:05 AM
Andy Andy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 417
Default Worst front offices



luke witte has a wiki entry, but corky "the knee" taylor doesn't.
wierd.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-22-2006, 04:40 PM
Matt Matt is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 766
Default Worst front offices


Jim Welters wrote:
Quote:
Slam magazine takes a look at the worst NBA front offices: http://slamonline.com/online/2006/0...-front-offices/ Yep, our man McHale's number one.


Remember the good old days when I would say McHale sucks and everyone
would bash me for it? I wish there was some satisfaction in watching
everyone eat crow, but there just isn't.

Matt

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-23-2006, 01:42 PM
levi levi is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 381
Default Worst front offices

Matt wrote:
Quote:
Jim Welters wrote:
Quote:
Slam magazine takes a look at the worst NBA front offices: http://slamonline.com/online/2006/0...-front-offices/ Yep, our man McHale's number one.
Remember the good old days when I would say McHale sucks and everyone would bash me for it? I wish there was some satisfaction in watching everyone eat crow, but there just isn't. Matt


Good on ya, Matt. I reviewed some of your invective
from years past and it still sticks to the wall.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-26-2006, 10:08 AM
Andy Andy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 417
Default Worst front offices


levi wrote:
Quote:
Matt wrote:
Quote:
Jim Welters wrote:
Quote:
Slam magazine takes a look at the worst NBA front offices: http://slamonline.com/online/2006/0...-front-offices/ Yep, our man McHale's number one.
Remember the good old days when I would say McHale sucks and everyone would bash me for it? I wish there was some satisfaction in watching everyone eat crow, but there just isn't. Matt
Good on ya, Matt. I reviewed some of your invective from years past and it still sticks to the wall.


The thing that puzzles me is Glen Taylor's loyalty to McHale. If McHale
performed like this managing any of Taylors other businesses, it's hard
to believe he'd leave him in place. I'm sure Glen wouldn't fire him,
he'd find a lesser position for him, and ease him into an area of
competence that couldn't hurt Glen's business, or his other employees.
Surely Taylor, an intelligent man, has read or heard of the Peter
principle? Enough is enough. If McHale doesn't step asside willingly,
he needs to be shoved.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-26-2006, 12:43 PM
levi levi is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 381
Default Worst front offices

Andy H wrote:
Quote:
levi wrote:
Quote:
Matt wrote:
Quote:
Jim Welters wrote: > Slam magazine takes a look at the worst NBA front offices: > > http://slamonline.com/online/2006/0...-front-offices/ > > Yep, our man McHale's number one. Remember the good old days when I would say McHale sucks and everyone would bash me for it? I wish there was some satisfaction in watching everyone eat crow, but there just isn't. Matt
Good on ya, Matt. I reviewed some of your invective from years past and it still sticks to the wall.
The thing that puzzles me is Glen Taylor's loyalty to McHale. If McHale performed like this managing any of Taylors other businesses, it's hard to believe he'd leave him in place. I'm sure Glen wouldn't fire him, he'd find a lesser position for him, and ease him into an area of competence that couldn't hurt Glen's business, or his other employees. Surely Taylor, an intelligent man, has read or heard of the Peter principle? Enough is enough. If McHale doesn't step asside willingly, he needs to be shoved.


That KG turned out to be such a great player has IMO,
the main thing that has kept McHale employed for so
long.

What Taylor's "loyalty" strongly suggests to me is that the
Wolves ownership is not passionately interested in vying
for a championship, it is really just trying to achieve a profit.
Just keep the salaries in line, get enough sheeple coming in
to support the team, along with advertising revenues, etc.

KG is the lynchpin of this "strategy". He is why people
are interested in watching the Wolves.

Sure, Taylor spent some $7M on a scoreboard, seats, and
a restaurant (while us taxpayers ponied up a matching $7M
to get-r-done), but that's peanuts, really.

I believe that the "big" payoff for Taylor comes from the
increasing value of the team. There are other ways to profit,
as in tax writeoffs, even if the team "loses" money. Even so,
Taylor and his partners get to live the high life as VIPs
within the NBA - there is an ego thing too.

If it wasn't for the fabulous money that KG takes home,
I'd feel very sad, perhaps even angered at the exploitation
of his talent. As it stands, I can only shrug that such a
great player (and person, IMO) has been "wasted" and
not given the support necessary to compete for a
championship.

All things considered, the NBA is simply entertainment.
And the Wolves are really just a soap opera.

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-27-2006, 05:34 AM
Jim Welters Jim Welters is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6
Default Worst front offices

One of the ESPN.com writers made the same point about McHale that you did.
The only way McHale keeps his job is that he's doing the boss's will. As I
told the Wolves ticket guy who called to find out why I cancelled my season
tickets after 10 seasons, "I just don't get the feeling that the team
management knows how to build a winning team, or they don't really care to."
The Wolves are much more valuable with Garnett than without. Is it any
coincidence that there were rumors this year about somebody buying 30% of
the team, displacing some of the minority owners?

Jim Welters


in article 1159274637.003771.266420@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups. com, levi at
levi@visi.com wrote on 9/26/06 7:43 AM:
Quote:
Andy H wrote:
Quote:
levi wrote:
Quote:
Matt wrote:> Jim Welters wrote:>> Slam magazine takes a look at the worst NBA front offices:>>>> http://slamonline.com/online/2006/0...-front-offices/>>>> Yep, our man McHale's number one.>> Remember the good old days when I would say McHale sucks and everyone> would bash me for it? I wish there was some satisfaction in watching> everyone eat crow, but there just isn't.>> Matt Good on ya, Matt. I reviewed some of your invective from years past and it still sticks to the wall.
The thing that puzzles me is Glen Taylor's loyalty to McHale. If McHale performed like this managing any of Taylors other businesses, it's hard to believe he'd leave him in place. I'm sure Glen wouldn't fire him, he'd find a lesser position for him, and ease him into an area of competence that couldn't hurt Glen's business, or his other employees. Surely Taylor, an intelligent man, has read or heard of the Peter principle? Enough is enough. If McHale doesn't step asside willingly, he needs to be shoved.
That KG turned out to be such a great player has IMO, the main thing that has kept McHale employed for so long. What Taylor's "loyalty" strongly suggests to me is that the Wolves ownership is not passionately interested in vying for a championship, it is really just trying to achieve a profit. Just keep the salaries in line, get enough sheeple coming in to support the team, along with advertising revenues, etc. KG is the lynchpin of this "strategy". He is why people are interested in watching the Wolves. Sure, Taylor spent some $7M on a scoreboard, seats, and a restaurant (while us taxpayers ponied up a matching $7M to get-r-done), but that's peanuts, really. I believe that the "big" payoff for Taylor comes from the increasing value of the team. There are other ways to profit, as in tax writeoffs, even if the team "loses" money. Even so, Taylor and his partners get to live the high life as VIPs within the NBA - there is an ego thing too. If it wasn't for the fabulous money that KG takes home, I'd feel very sad, perhaps even angered at the exploitation of his talent. As it stands, I can only shrug that such a great player (and person, IMO) has been "wasted" and not given the support necessary to compete for a championship. All things considered, the NBA is simply entertainment. And the Wolves are really just a soap opera.


Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19 AM.


MyLounge.com Site Map
Forum: Cars, Cell Phone, Database, Gambling, Games, Home Improvement, IT, Music, School, Sports, Web Design, Web Server, Weight Loss

The MyLounge.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for any advice. The information contained on MyLounge.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of MyLounge.com. MyLounge.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of MyLounge.com Term of Service

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.