Sports Forums  

Go Back   Sports Forums > Baseball > Chicago Whitesox
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-26-2006, 12:39 PM
Gary S. Simon Gary S. Simon is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 464
Default Hindsight


I questioned the acquisition of Thome, patially because I worried
about Thome's ability to get and stay healthy, and partially because the
deal probably meant that Thomas would be gone. Clearly, I was wrong
insofar as Thome had a great season (although Thomas' wasn't bad, ether).

I also questioned the Vasquez trade. I still do.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-26-2006, 01:18 PM
expuffer expuffer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 46
Default Hindsight

The shit sox lose, The shit sox lose. hehehe

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-26-2006, 01:51 PM
DrCrawdad DrCrawdad is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 283
Default Hindsight


Gary S. Simon wrote:
Quote:
I questioned the acquisition of Thome, patially because I worried about Thome's ability to get and stay healthy, and partially because the deal probably meant that Thomas would be gone. Clearly, I was wrong insofar as Thome had a great season (although Thomas' wasn't bad, ether).


Without the stats in front of me it sure seems as though the '06 Sox
grounded into many more inning ending double plays. Thome is not
slower than Thomas and/or Everett, but Thome and the '06 Sox seemed
much slower and plodding. Last night was just another example of their
lack of execution, bases loaded in the first inning and the result is
only one run scored.
Quote:
I also questioned the Vasquez trade. I still do.


Vasquez was better than the collection the Sox had as #5 starters last
season. Where this trade hurt the Sox was the loss of Luis Vizcaíno.
The Sox '05 bullpen was terrible and Vizcaino did a good job in the
second half of last season whereas Cotts, Polite and others in the Sox
'06 bullpen have been gas cans.

We'll see in the long run what Chris Young does. When he was called up
he went on a streak but has leveled off since. It will be interesting
to see who develops into a better player, Anderson or Young.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-27-2006, 01:19 AM
Jim Jim is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 44
Default Hindsight

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:39:35 GMT, "Gary S. Simon"
<garscosi@thisisatypo.pipeline.com> wrote:
Quote:
I questioned the acquisition of Thome, patially because I worriedabout Thome's ability to get and stay healthy, and partially because thedeal probably meant that Thomas would be gone. Clearly, I was wronginsofar as Thome had a great season (although Thomas' wasn't bad, ether).


I didn't like the Thome Rowand trade to begin with and still don't.
Thome had a great HALF of a season. The second half for whatever the
reason was almost mediocre. Gone with Rowand was a certain amount of
grttiness and blue collar (grinder if you will) attitude. In 2 years
Thome will be gone and for the next 6-8 Rowand will be playing great
defensive centerfield and hitting 270-290. As usual KW gave up way too
much to get HIS guy. Probably could have had Thome for a song for what
he was getting paid (with the emergnce of the other first baseman (his
name escapes me at the moment)).



Quote:
I also questioned the Vasquez trade. I still do.

And you should. Really the Sox didn't improve any with the trade. I
think they bought innings (Vasquez has always thrown around 200 per
year) and upside (because of his age) What they have found is that
Vasquez is the same pitcher he has always been. His ERA in Monreal
was about the same (if you adjust for the DH ) as it was in 2005 for
the Sox. His ERA this year is about the same as it was for the Yankees
and for Arizona (same adjustment) . With the stuff he has I think the
Sox probably felt he might finally turn the corner and become the
pitcher he could be. He reminds me of a guy we had a long time ago
named Jose De Leon. Tremendous stuff but always pitched just good
enough to lose.( I think he lost 19 games a couple of times And was
often refered to as the best 4-19ptcher you had ever seen) (BTW we
traded Bobby Bonilla to get him)

Just my 2 cents

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:25 PM.


MyLounge.com Site Map
Forum: Cars, Cell Phone, Database, Games, Home Improvement, IT, Music, School, Sports, Web Design, Web Server, Weight Loss

The MyLounge.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for any advice. The information contained on MyLounge.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of MyLounge.com. MyLounge.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of MyLounge.com Term of Service

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.