For what very little it's worth

09-27-2006, 04:06 PM

Gary S. Simon Gary S. Simon is offline

Junior Member

Join Date: Nov 2003

Posts: 464

For what very little it's worth

From Elias (on the ESPN.com site):

Since July 2, the Cubs (35-43) have a better record than the White
Sox (34-44).

09-27-2006, 05:37 PM

The old geezer The old geezer is offline

Junior Member

Join Date: Apr 2005

Posts: 125

For what very little it's worth

Gary S. Simon wrote:

Quote:

From Elias (on the ESPN.com site): Since July 2, the Cubs (35-43) have a better record than the White Sox (34-44).

....At least they got *that* going for them!!!

TOG

09-27-2006, 07:18 PM

DrCrawdad

Junior Member

Join Date: Mar 2005

Posts: 283

For what very little it's worth

Gary S. Simon wrote:

Quote:

From Elias (on the ESPN.com site): Since July 2, the Cubs (35-43) have a better record than the White Sox (34-44).

What exactly is that worth?

Do they get a prize for having a better record in the second half BUT
being the worst team in the worst division in the worst league in MLB?

09-28-2006, 10:57 AM

Zeke

Junior Member

Join Date: Aug 2005

Posts: 274

For what very little it's worth

I think that there's something very wrong in the sport. I think that it's
manipulated by the league. How does a team perform so well for one half of
the season and then play completely the opposite - without injury? Mariotti
or Selig. Watch, next year his Brewers will be "on top".

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:11 AM.