Sports Forums  

Go Back   Sports Forums > Baseball > St Louis Cardinals
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-28-2006, 06:32 PM
David Emerling David Emerling is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 142
Default Peter Gammons on ESPN radio

Dan Patrick interviewed Peter Gammons today.

Gammons believes the Albert Pujols should get the NL MVP. Dan Patrick agreed
and was of the opinion the Howard doesn't deserve because he has accumulated
far too many strikeouts.

A quote from Gammons regarding the Cardinals recent woes, "It may be one of
the greatest collapses, but it's amazing they're there in the first place."

How true!

You can't really qualify as having engineered a "great collapse" unless you
have first obtained something you are completely deserving of. The Cardinals
have staggered through the the entire season. Pujols has put this team on
his back and carried them from day one and, in the waning moments of the
season, he continues to do so.

I don't see how any player could be more valuable to their team than Albert
Pujols was to the Cardinals this season. You take Pujols out of the lineup
and we are easily a 4th place team, at best.

David Emerling
Memphis, TN



Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-28-2006, 06:43 PM
bottom feeder bottom feeder is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1
Default Peter Gammons on ESPN radio

David Emerling wrote:
Quote:
Dan Patrick interviewed Peter Gammons today. Gammons believes the Albert Pujols should get the NL MVP. Dan Patrick agreed and was of the opinion the Howard doesn't deserve because he has accumulated far too many strikeouts. A quote from Gammons regarding the Cardinals recent woes, "It may be one of the greatest collapses, but it's amazing they're there in the first place." How true! You can't really qualify as having engineered a "great collapse" unless you have first obtained something you are completely deserving of. The Cardinals have staggered through the the entire season. Pujols has put this team on his back and carried them from day one and, in the waning moments of the season, he continues to do so. I don't see how any player could be more valuable to their team than Albert Pujols was to the Cardinals this season. You take Pujols out of the lineup and we are easily a 4th place team, at best.



i know i'm not supposed to do those "i completely agree posts", but i
completely agree.

--
dan
Quote:
David Emerling Memphis, TN

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-28-2006, 07:58 PM
TJ-BF TJ-BF is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 468
Default Peter Gammons on ESPN radio

x-no-archive: yes

"David Emerling" <demerlinHATESPAM@midsouth.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3zUSg.5402$pq4.3920@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
Quote:
Dan Patrick interviewed Peter Gammons today.
Gammons believes the Albert Pujols should get the NL MVP. Dan Patrick agreed > and was of the opinion the Howard doesn't deserve because he has accumulated > far too many strikeouts. A quote from Gammons regarding the Cardinals recent woes, "It may be one of the greatest collapses, but it's amazing they're there in the first place." How true! You can't really qualify as having engineered a "great collapse" unless you have first obtained something you are completely deserving of. The Cardinals > have staggered through the the entire season. Pujols has put this team on his back and carried them from day one and, in the waning moments of the season, he continues to do so. I don't see how any player could be more valuable to their team than Albert Pujols was to the Cardinals this season. You take Pujols out of the lineup and we are easily a 4th place team, at best.


Pujols has 25 GWRBIs, 19 by HRs alone.
Take those 25 game-wins away, and the standings look like this today
instead of the present StL record 81-76 .516 and 1.5 GA:


NL Central

Team W L Pct GB

Hou 80 78 .506 ...
Cin 78 80 .494 2
Mil 73 85 .462 7
Pit 65 93 .411 15
Chi 65 94 .409 15.5
StL 56 101 .357 23.5


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2006, 01:15 AM
Ron Ron is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5
Default Peter Gammons on ESPN radio


David Emerling wrote:
Quote:
I don't see how any player could be more valuable to their team than Albert Pujols was to the Cardinals this season. You take Pujols out of the lineup and we are easily a 4th place team, at best.



That there's even a discussion on this topic is amazing to me. Pujols
is a man playing among boys. To put up the numbers he does when most
teams are pitching around him puts him in a class by himself.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2006, 02:24 AM
Terry Lomax Terry Lomax is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 587
Default Peter Gammons on ESPN radio

David Emerling wrote:
Quote:
Dan Patrick interviewed Peter Gammons today. Gammons believes the Albert Pujols should get the NL MVP. Dan Patrick agreed and was of the opinion the Howard doesn't deserve because he has accumulated far too many strikeouts.


Lance is being awfully quiet on this thread. Shouldn't Lance be
spouting his mantra of strikeouts not being important?
Quote:
I don't see how any player could be more valuable to their team than Albert Pujols was to the Cardinals this season. You take Pujols out of the lineup and we are easily a 4th place team, at best.


Probably, but the Cardinals did have a good record in the games Pujols
was disabled. The team, especially Encarnacion, stepped up and played
hard, maintaining the good pace we had at the time.

Howard is going to win the award because sportwriters are enamored with
huge home run (and RBI) totals.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2006, 02:37 AM
ItMightBeItCouldBE it is ItMightBeItCouldBE it is is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 202
Default Peter Gammons on ESPN radio


David Emerling wrote:
Quote:
Dan Patrick interviewed Peter Gammons today. Gammons believes the Albert Pujols should get the NL MVP. Dan Patrick agreed and was of the opinion the Howard doesn't deserve because he has accumulated far too many strikeouts. A quote from Gammons regarding the Cardinals recent woes, "It may be one of the greatest collapses, but it's amazing they're there in the first place." How true! You can't really qualify as having engineered a "great collapse" unless you have first obtained something you are completely deserving of. The Cardinals have staggered through the the entire season. Pujols has put this team on his back and carried them from day one and, in the waning moments of the season, he continues to do so. I don't see how any player could be more valuable to their team than Albert Pujols was to the Cardinals this season. You take Pujols out of the lineup and we are easily a 4th place team, at best. David Emerling Memphis, TN


I DONTGIVE A DAMN ABOUT THE MVP ...WHY SHOULD ANYONE ??????
they only pay for winning the divisions and the World
Series....sheeeshh.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2006, 03:20 AM
David Emerling David Emerling is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 142
Default Peter Gammons on ESPN radio


"The curse of Danny Boy still rules the air waves" <fastpitstops@aol.com>
wrote in message
news:1159497457.862688.111620@m73g2000cwd.googlegr oups.com...
Quote:
David Emerling wrote:
Quote:
Dan Patrick interviewed Peter Gammons today. Gammons believes the Albert Pujols should get the NL MVP. Dan Patrick agreed and was of the opinion the Howard doesn't deserve because he has accumulated far too many strikeouts. A quote from Gammons regarding the Cardinals recent woes, "It may be one of the greatest collapses, but it's amazing they're there in the first place." How true! You can't really qualify as having engineered a "great collapse" unless you have first obtained something you are completely deserving of. The Cardinals have staggered through the the entire season. Pujols has put this team on his back and carried them from day one and, in the waning moments of the season, he continues to do so. I don't see how any player could be more valuable to their team than Albert Pujols was to the Cardinals this season. You take Pujols out of the lineup and we are easily a 4th place team, at best. David Emerling Memphis, TN
I DONTGIVE A DAMN ABOUT THE MVP ...WHY SHOULD ANYONE ?????? they only pay for winning the divisions and the World Series....sheeeshh.


I care because if things keep going like they're going, it may be the only
remnant of this season worth taking pride in - as miniscule as it is.

And, you're right - it *is* miniscule in comparison.

The objective of the Cardinal organization is *not* to produce individual
award winners.

Good point.

David Emerling
Memphis, TN


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-29-2006, 06:32 AM
stratbat stratbat is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 38
Default Peter Gammons on ESPN radio


TJ-BF wrote:
Quote:
Pujols has 25 GWRBIs, 19 by HRs alone. Take those 25 game-wins away, and the standings look like this today instead of the present StL record 81-76 .516 and 1.5 GA: NL Central Team W L Pct GB Hou 80 78 .506 ... Cin 78 80 .494 2 Mil 73 85 .462 7 Pit 65 93 .411 15 Chi 65 94 .409 15.5 StL 56 101 .357 23.5


Taking your analysis at face value, that is a remarkable measure of one
player's value to his team. It tells us a lot about Pujols value, and
tells us a lot about how dismal the rest of the team has performed.
Pujols spares us finishing 8 games behind the Cubs!? Egads!

Stratbat

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-29-2006, 07:02 PM
Lance Freezeland Lance Freezeland is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,797
Default Peter Gammons on ESPN radio

On 28 Sep 2006 19:24:36 -0700, "Terry Lomax" <Lomax47@hotmail.com>
gave us:
Quote:
David Emerling wrote:
Quote:
Dan Patrick interviewed Peter Gammons today.

Gammons believes the Albert Pujols should get the NL MVP. Dan Patrick agreed and was of the opinion the Howard doesn't deserve because he has accumulated far too many strikeouts.
Lance is being awfully quiet on this thread. Shouldn't Lance bespouting his mantra of strikeouts not being important?


You're too simplistic to understand it, Ahti, but for the purposes of
determing MVP, strikeouts shouldn't be part of the discussion.
They're outs period. If you're trying to determine who you might want
to be at the plate in a defined situation, however, they are a
relevant consideration.

Now that I've answered your question, how about answering a few of
mine, some of which you've been dodging for nearly a year now.

How long does a person have to live in an area in order to no longer
be considered by you to be a "transient"? Should people be restricted
to some geographical radius surrounding their birthplace? If so, how
many miles would such a radius extend?

Are you a socialist? Do you believe in a caste system, and, if so,
which class do you belong to?

What events in your past have led you to be so bitter about your lack
of upward mobility in life?

I look forward to your responses, Ahti.

--
Lance

"There are three-hundred thousand sportswriters
and they're all against me. Every one of them."
-- Joaquin Andujar

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-29-2006, 08:40 PM
Terry Lomax Terry Lomax is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 587
Default Peter Gammons on ESPN radio


stratbat wrote:
Quote:
TJ-BF wrote:
Quote:
Pujols has 25 GWRBIs, 19 by HRs alone. Take those 25 game-wins away, and the standings look like this today instead of the present StL record 81-76 .516 and 1.5 GA: NL Central Team W L Pct GB Hou 80 78 .506 ... Cin 78 80 .494 2 Mil 73 85 .462 7 Pit 65 93 .411 15 Chi 65 94 .409 15.5 StL 56 101 .357 23.5
Taking your analysis at face value, that is a remarkable measure of one player's value to his team. It tells us a lot about Pujols value, and tells us a lot about how dismal the rest of the team has performed. Pujols spares us finishing 8 games behind the Cubs!? Egads!


Actually we'd be even farther back. Some of those game-winners were
against NL Central teams, so the other teams would have more wins. For
example, Pujols hit one off Lidge this season, didn't he? That's at
least one more win for Houston.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:30 PM.


MyLounge.com Site Map
Forum: Cars, Cell Phone, Database, Games, Home Improvement, IT, Music, School, Sports, Web Design, Web Server, Weight Loss

The MyLounge.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for any advice. The information contained on MyLounge.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of MyLounge.com. MyLounge.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of MyLounge.com Term of Service

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.