Sports Forums  

Go Back   Sports Forums > Baseball > Pittsburg Pirates
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-02-2006, 03:34 AM
CandyFan CandyFan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 27
Default NOW, where are the critics? Pirates get out of the cellar - play .500 ball 2nd half

Maybe the critics were right, these young Pirates aren't major league
material.

They were too old - played too long in the minors

and

They weren't the right kind of players

and

They couldn't do this and couldn't do that

and

They would never win with this team

and,

and

and,

ad
nausem............................................ .....................................


Geeze, maybe they were wrong and maybe they'll continue to be wrong?

Nah, go back to sleep.


CF-

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-02-2006, 11:24 AM
Matt Davis Matt Davis is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,190
Default NOW, where are the critics? Pirates get out of the cellar - play .500 ball 2nd half

They started to win when they put Burnitz on the bench, a move that was
called for from the first or second week of the season. They started to win
when they left Sanchez in the line up instead of Randa. They started to win
when they sent Duffy back to the minors for an attitude adjustment. They
started to win when the pitching staff started getting out of the first
inning without giving up runs. To win in 2007 they need to dump Burnitz,
find a solid lead off hitter and hire a pitching coach that knows his ass
from a hole in the ground.

It's time for the brainless trust to begin trading the talent to rebuild.


"CandyFan" <candyfan@earthlink.com> wrote in message
news:au11i2tor6dr3stolot3cnr8pncolmlg62@4ax.com...
Quote:
Maybe the critics were right, these young Pirates aren't major league material. They were too old - played too long in the minors and They weren't the right kind of players and They couldn't do this and couldn't do that and They would never win with this team and, and and, ad nausem............................................ ..................................... Geeze, maybe they were wrong and maybe they'll continue to be wrong? Nah, go back to sleep. CF-



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-02-2006, 12:26 PM
Luv2golf Luv2golf is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 43
Default NOW, where are the critics? Pirates get out of the cellar - play .500 ball 2nd half


"CandyFan" <candyfan@earthlink.com> wrote in message
news:au11i2tor6dr3stolot3cnr8pncolmlg62@4ax.com...
Quote:
Maybe the critics were right, these young Pirates aren't major league material. They were too old - played too long in the minors


They are not too old. Just lead by stupid, greedy people.

Quote:
They would never win with this team


They did not win. They played a lower level of team in the 2nd half of the
2nd half.

They went 2-8 their last 10. They sucked any way you cut it.


Next year the slogan will be "We won't" short for "We won't win."


The Pirates will only improve when the useful idiot fans quit going to the
games which might cause twinkle toes McClatchy and the Nutty crew to
actually field a real baseball team.


Chuck





Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-02-2006, 01:02 PM
artyw artyw is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 42
Default NOW, where are the critics? Pirates get out of the cellar - play .500 ball 2nd half -


"The Real" Matt Davis wrote:
Quote:
They started to win when they put Burnitz on the bench, a move that was called for from the first or second week of the season. They started to win when they left Sanchez in the line up instead of Randa. They started to win when they sent Duffy back to the minors for an attitude adjustment. They started to win when the pitching staff started getting out of the first inning without giving up runs. To win in 2007 they need to dump Burnitz, find a solid lead off hitter and hire a pitching coach that knows his ass from a hole in the ground.


Finding a first baseman who doesn't make Craig Wilson look like Albert
Pujols is also a good idea.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-02-2006, 01:47 PM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default NOW, where are the critics? Pirates get out of the cellar - play .500 ball 2nd half -


CandyFan wrote:
Quote:
Geeze, maybe they were wrong and maybe they'll continue to be wrong? Nah, go back to sleep.


Are you joking? You must be because nobody can be this dumb.

The critics were wrong about the team because the Cubs endured an
injury fueled melt down and finished one game worse than the Pirates?
Gimme a break.

Let me break down the reality of the situation for you:

The critics said money was not the major stumbling block for the
organization, poor decision making was. Fact: despite adding nearly 18
million in payroll on veteran players the team failed to gain a single
win over last year's record finishing 65-97 and avoiding a 100 loss
season by only 3 games for a second year in a row.

The critics said signing high priced veteran hitters Burnitz, Casey and
Randa would NOT improve the teams offense and the team had no talent in
the minors to fall back on. Fact: through the first half of the season
the veteran led club had one of the worst offenses in the league and
majors and post All Star Break they worked their way into the WORST
offenses in the league, second worst in the majors avoiding the last
place honors by a mere three runs and were far and away the worst
performing offense in the majors in the second half of the season.

The critics said that the teams obsession with pitching and defense to
the exclusion of offense was a dubious and high risk strategy that
would certainly fail because injuries would grind up much of the young
talent they were counting on and the expectation that late season call
ups would produce at the same level over the course of a season were
unrealistic and the defense was not as good as the front office and
local media would have us believe. Fact: the team saw many of their
top pitching prospects lose time to injury, the pitchers who performed
well at the end of last season struggled most of the year and in the
end the team finished with an ERA HIGHER and gave up more runs overall
than the 2005 Pirates

I hate to tell you this, but the critics were balls on the mark and
nothing the Cubs did or didn't do changes that.

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-02-2006, 02:52 PM
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default NOW, where are the critics? Pirates get out of the cellar - play .500 ball 2nd half -


p62c61@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
The critics said money was not the major stumbling block for the organization, poor decision making was. Fact: despite adding nearly 18 million in payroll on veteran players the team failed to gain a single win over last year's record finishing 65-97...


Of course that should be 67-95 for the second year in a row.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-02-2006, 05:14 PM
Matt Davis Matt Davis is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,190
Default NOW, where are the critics? Pirates get out of the cellar - play .500 ball 2nd half


"Luv2golf" <youkiddingme@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:HpGdnQh_h-T1mLzYnZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@comcast.com...
Quote:
"CandyFan" <candyfan@earthlink.com> wrote in message news:au11i2tor6dr3stolot3cnr8pncolmlg62@4ax.com...
Quote:
Maybe the critics were right, these young Pirates aren't major league material. They were too old - played too long in the minors
They are not too old. Just lead by stupid, greedy people.
Quote:
They would never win with this team
They did not win. They played a lower level of team in the 2nd half of the 2nd half. They went 2-8 their last 10. They sucked any way you cut it. Next year the slogan will be "We won't" short for "We won't win." The Pirates will only improve when the useful idiot fans quit going to the games which might cause twinkle toes McClatchy and the Nutty crew to actually field a real baseball team. Chuck


Yeah, like that will happen! Everyone is in love with PNC park. It's a good
give away for corporate seat holders. Send your clients to watch the Pirates
lose!


Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-02-2006, 08:40 PM
Greg Schuler Greg Schuler is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 33
Default NOW, where are the critics? Pirates get out of the cellar - play .500 ball 2nd half -


CandyFan wrote:
Quote:
Maybe the critics were right, these young Pirates aren't major league material. They were too old - played too long in the minors


True for the most part. If people expect Freddy Sanchez to hit .343
every year, they will be disappointed.
Quote:
and They weren't the right kind of players


True again. The Pirate slacked power in the worst way and even when the
team did hit the ball, there weren't enough baserunners on to score
runs.
Quote:
and They couldn't do this and couldn't do that


The Pirates were a bad team - period. They barely prevented a 100-loss
season. How this triggers optimism is beyond me.
Quote:
and They would never win with this team


True again - 65 wins is below .500 (well below). Therefore, the Pirates
are losers - again. And I find it hard to see how they can improve some
20 wins unless radical and major changes are made.
Quote:
and, and and, ad nausem............................................ ..................................... Geeze, maybe they were wrong and maybe they'll continue to be wrong?


Well, no - most of the critics were dead right.
Quote:
Nah, go back to sleep.


Take your own advice.
Quote:
CF-


Wow...if a 65 win season gets people this fired up, I can't wait to see
what happens if the Pirates break 75 wins.

As much as I'd like to forget the first 90 games of the season, they
still count. And a lot of questions remain surrounding the Pirates. But
if it makes you feel better that a team can celebrate winning two more
games than it lost over a random period of time, well then, party on.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-03-2006, 12:35 AM
jimpgh2002 jimpgh2002 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 71
Default NOW, where are the critics? Pirates get out of the cellar - play .500 ball 2nd half -

On 2 Oct 2006 07:52:11 -0700, p62c61@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
p62c61@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
The critics said money was not the major stumbling block for the organization, poor decision making was. Fact: despite adding nearly 18 million in payroll on veteran players the team failed to gain a single win over last year's record finishing 65-97...
Of course that should be 67-95 for the second year in a row.


The Cubs payroll was double the Pirates.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-03-2006, 12:45 AM
jimpgh2002 jimpgh2002 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 71
Default NOW, where are the critics? Pirates get out of the cellar - play .500 ball 2nd half -

On 2 Oct 2006 13:40:54 -0700, "Greg Schuler" <schuleg@comcast.net>
wrote:
Quote:
CandyFan wrote:
Quote:
Maybe the critics were right, these young Pirates aren't major league material. They were too old - played too long in the minors
True for the most part. If people expect Freddy Sanchez to hit .343every year, they will be disappointed.

If people expect ANY player to hit .343, they will be
disappointed. I doubt that anyone expects Sanchez to attain that bA
again...ever.
That said, he can play SS or 2B and hit better than your
typical MI. If they put him at one of those positions, it would be a
step in the right direction.
Quote:
and They weren't the right kind of playersTrue again. The Pirate slacked power in the worst way and even when theteam did hit the ball, there weren't enough baserunners on to scoreruns.
Quote:
and They couldn't do this and couldn't do that
The Pirates were a bad team - period. They barely prevented a 100-lossseason. How this triggers optimism is beyond me.

Yeah, they WERE bad, until after the ALL-Star game. They then
attained mediocrity, which may be enough in their division.


Quote:
and They would never win with this teamTrue again - 65 wins is below .500 (well below). Therefore, the Piratesare losers - again. And I find it hard to see how they can improve some20 wins unless radical and major changes are made.
Quote:
and, and and, ad nausem............................................ ..................................... Geeze, maybe they were wrong and maybe they'll continue to be wrong?
Well, no - most of the critics were dead right.
Quote:
Nah, go back to sleep.
Take your own advice.
Quote:
CF-
Wow...if a 65 win season gets people this fired up, I can't wait to seewhat happens if the Pirates break 75 wins.As much as I'd like to forget the first 90 games of the season, theystill count. And a lot of questions remain surrounding the Pirates. Butif it makes you feel better that a team can celebrate winning two moregames than it lost over a random period of time, well then, party on.


It made me feel better that they played above .500 after the
All-Star game. That wasn't random...they made changes like playing
Nady and NOT playing Burnitz. Duffy came back and turned his season
and perhaps his career around. The piching rotation changed. The
bullpen was solid.
Now if only Cuban would buy the Bucs!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:23 PM.


MyLounge.com Site Map
Forum: Cars, Cell Phone, Database, Games, Home Improvement, IT, Music, School, Sports, Web Design, Web Server, Weight Loss

The MyLounge.com forum is intended for informational use only and should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for any advice. The information contained on MyLounge.com are opinions and suggestions of members and is not a representation of the opinions of MyLounge.com. MyLounge.com does not warrant or vouch for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any postings or the qualifications of any person responding. Please consult a expert or seek the services of an attorney in your area for more accuracy on your specific situation. Please note that our forums also serve as mirrors to Usenet newsgroups. Many posts you see on our forums are made by newsgroup users who may not be members of MyLounge.com Term of Service

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.