![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maybe the critics were right, these young Pirates aren't major league
material. They were too old - played too long in the minors and They weren't the right kind of players and They couldn't do this and couldn't do that and They would never win with this team and, and and, ad nausem............................................ ..................................... Geeze, maybe they were wrong and maybe they'll continue to be wrong? Nah, go back to sleep. CF- |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
They started to win when they put Burnitz on the bench, a move that was
called for from the first or second week of the season. They started to win when they left Sanchez in the line up instead of Randa. They started to win when they sent Duffy back to the minors for an attitude adjustment. They started to win when the pitching staff started getting out of the first inning without giving up runs. To win in 2007 they need to dump Burnitz, find a solid lead off hitter and hire a pitching coach that knows his ass from a hole in the ground. It's time for the brainless trust to begin trading the talent to rebuild. "CandyFan" <candyfan@earthlink.com> wrote in message news:au11i2tor6dr3stolot3cnr8pncolmlg62@4ax.com... Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"CandyFan" <candyfan@earthlink.com> wrote in message news:au11i2tor6dr3stolot3cnr8pncolmlg62@4ax.com... Quote:
They are not too old. Just lead by stupid, greedy people. Quote:
They did not win. They played a lower level of team in the 2nd half of the 2nd half. They went 2-8 their last 10. They sucked any way you cut it. Next year the slogan will be "We won't" short for "We won't win." The Pirates will only improve when the useful idiot fans quit going to the games which might cause twinkle toes McClatchy and the Nutty crew to actually field a real baseball team. Chuck |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"The Real" Matt Davis wrote: Quote:
Finding a first baseman who doesn't make Craig Wilson look like Albert Pujols is also a good idea. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
CandyFan wrote: Quote:
Are you joking? You must be because nobody can be this dumb. The critics were wrong about the team because the Cubs endured an injury fueled melt down and finished one game worse than the Pirates? Gimme a break. Let me break down the reality of the situation for you: The critics said money was not the major stumbling block for the organization, poor decision making was. Fact: despite adding nearly 18 million in payroll on veteran players the team failed to gain a single win over last year's record finishing 65-97 and avoiding a 100 loss season by only 3 games for a second year in a row. The critics said signing high priced veteran hitters Burnitz, Casey and Randa would NOT improve the teams offense and the team had no talent in the minors to fall back on. Fact: through the first half of the season the veteran led club had one of the worst offenses in the league and majors and post All Star Break they worked their way into the WORST offenses in the league, second worst in the majors avoiding the last place honors by a mere three runs and were far and away the worst performing offense in the majors in the second half of the season. The critics said that the teams obsession with pitching and defense to the exclusion of offense was a dubious and high risk strategy that would certainly fail because injuries would grind up much of the young talent they were counting on and the expectation that late season call ups would produce at the same level over the course of a season were unrealistic and the defense was not as good as the front office and local media would have us believe. Fact: the team saw many of their top pitching prospects lose time to injury, the pitchers who performed well at the end of last season struggled most of the year and in the end the team finished with an ERA HIGHER and gave up more runs overall than the 2005 Pirates I hate to tell you this, but the critics were balls on the mark and nothing the Cubs did or didn't do changes that. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
p62c61@gmail.com wrote: Quote:
Of course that should be 67-95 for the second year in a row. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Luv2golf" <youkiddingme@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:HpGdnQh_h-T1mLzYnZ2dnUVZ_qmdnZ2d@comcast.com... Quote:
Yeah, like that will happen! Everyone is in love with PNC park. It's a good give away for corporate seat holders. Send your clients to watch the Pirates lose! |
|
#8
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
CandyFan wrote: Quote:
True for the most part. If people expect Freddy Sanchez to hit .343 every year, they will be disappointed. Quote:
True again. The Pirate slacked power in the worst way and even when the team did hit the ball, there weren't enough baserunners on to score runs. Quote:
The Pirates were a bad team - period. They barely prevented a 100-loss season. How this triggers optimism is beyond me. Quote:
True again - 65 wins is below .500 (well below). Therefore, the Pirates are losers - again. And I find it hard to see how they can improve some 20 wins unless radical and major changes are made. Quote:
Well, no - most of the critics were dead right. Quote:
Take your own advice. Quote:
Wow...if a 65 win season gets people this fired up, I can't wait to see what happens if the Pirates break 75 wins. As much as I'd like to forget the first 90 games of the season, they still count. And a lot of questions remain surrounding the Pirates. But if it makes you feel better that a team can celebrate winning two more games than it lost over a random period of time, well then, party on. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 2 Oct 2006 07:52:11 -0700, p62c61@gmail.com wrote:
Quote:
The Cubs payroll was double the Pirates. |
|
#10
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
On 2 Oct 2006 13:40:54 -0700, "Greg Schuler" <schuleg@comcast.net>
wrote: Quote:
If people expect ANY player to hit .343, they will be disappointed. I doubt that anyone expects Sanchez to attain that bA again...ever. That said, he can play SS or 2B and hit better than your typical MI. If they put him at one of those positions, it would be a step in the right direction. Quote:
Yeah, they WERE bad, until after the ALL-Star game. They then attained mediocrity, which may be enough in their division. Quote:
It made me feel better that they played above .500 after the All-Star game. That wasn't random...they made changes like playing Nady and NOT playing Burnitz. Duffy came back and turned his season and perhaps his career around. The piching rotation changed. The bullpen was solid. Now if only Cuban would buy the Bucs! |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|