x-no-archive: yes

http://www.baseball-reference.com/p/pujolal01.shtml


Pujols OBP % (compared to NL, park adjusted)

Year Pujols NL OBP OBP+
(park adjusted)

2001 .403 .338 119
2002 .394 .331 119
2003 .439 .335 131
2004 .415 .337 123
2005 .430 .342 126 (rounded)
2006 .431 .340 127 (rounded)
____________________________________
Total .419 .337 124


---

Pujols SLG % (compared to NL, park adjusted)

Year Pujols NL SLG SLG+
(park adjusted)

2001 .610 .438 139
2002 .561 .412 136
2003 .667 .423 158 (rounded)
2004 .657 .431 152
2005 .609 .431 141
2006 .671 .438 153
____________________________________
Total .629 .429 147 (rounded)


---

All-Time SLG Leaders Lg. SLG SLG+
(park adjusted)

B. Ruth .690 .400 172
T. Williams .634 .409 155
L. Gehrig .632 .412 153
A. PUJOLS .629 .429 147 (rounded)
J. Foxx .609 .422 144


---


Pujols OPS % (compared to NL, park adjusted)

Year Pujols NL OPS OPS+
(park adjusted)

2001 1.013 .776 158
2002 .955 .743 155
2003 1.106 .758 189
2004 1.072 .768 175
2005 1.039 .773 167
2006 1.102 .778 180
____________________________________
Total 1.048 .766 171


---

All-Time OPS Leaders Lg. OPS OPS+ Leaders
(park adjusted) (park adjusted)

1. B. Ruth 1.164 .753 207
2. T. Williams 1.116 .765 190
3. L. Gehrig 1.080 .768 179
4. B. Bonds 1.051 .740 182
5. A. PUJOLS 1.048 .766 171
6. J. Foxx 1.038 .784 163


---

Cardinals HR Leaders, season

1. Albert Pujols 49 (2006)
2. Albert Pujols 46 (2004)
3. Johnny Mize 43 (1940)
3. Albert Pujols 43 (2003)
(tie)
5. Rogers Hornsby 42 (1922)
5. Jim Edmonds 42 (2000, 2004)
(tie)


---

Cardinals HR career Leaders

1. Stan Musial 475
2. Ken Boyer 255
3. Albert PUJOLS 250
4. Jim EDMONDS 229 [121 with Angels; 350 career]
5. Ray Lankford 228


---

AP got his 700th career RBI (Sat. July 15, 2006).

Cardinals Top 20 RBI list (1901-2006)

min. 600 RBIs

Name RBI G AB

1. Stan Musial 1,951 3,026 10,972 (22 yrs., 1941-1944, 1946-1963)
2. Enos Slaughter 1,148 1,820 6,775 (13 yrs., 1938-1942, 1946-1953)
3. Jim Bottomley 1,105 1,392 5,314 (11 yrs., 1922-1932)
4. Rogers Hornsby 1,072 1,580 5,881 (13 yrs., 1915-1926, 1933)
5. Ken Boyer 1,001 1,667 6,334 (11 yrs., 1955-1965)
6. Ted Simmons 929 1,564 5,725 (13 yrs., 1968-1980)
7. Joe Medwick 923 1,216 4,747 (11 yrs., 1932-1940, 1947-1948)
8. Ray Lankford 829 1,580 5,417 (13 yrs., 1990-2001, 2004)
9. Lou Brock 814 2,289 9,125 (16 yrs., 1964-1979)
10. ALBERT PUJOLS 758 933 3,489 ( 6 yrs., 2001-2006)
11. Frankie Frisch 720 1,311 5,059 (11 yrs., 1927-1937)
12. Willie McGee 678 1,661 5,734 (13 yrs., 1982-1990, 1996-1999)
13. Ozzie Smith 664 1,990 7,160 (15 yrs., 1982-1996)
14. JIM EDMONDS 660 988 3,263 ( 7 yrs., 2000-2006)
15. Johnny Mize 653 854 3,121 ( 6 yrs., 1936-1941)
16. Red Schoendienst 651 1,795 6,841 (15 yrs., 1945-1956, 1961-1963)
17. Curt Flood 633 1,738 6,318 (12 yrs., 1958-1969)
18. Bill White 631 1,113 4,165 ( 8 yrs., 1959-1965, 1969)
19. Chick Hafey 618 812 2,953 ( 8 yrs., 1924-1931)
20. Marty Marion 605 1,502 5,313 (11 yrs., 1940-1950)

TJ-BF wrote:

This is all very interesting, but where are Mark McGwire's stats?

Just wondering,
Tom

In article <1160016201.981273.53830@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.co m>,
"Tom" <drsoong@aol.com> wrote:


Sounds like Roy's re-writing history again.

--
JD

"...if you think the 'Star Wars' prequels are a disease, then
'Serenity' is the cure."

x-no-archive: yes

"Jeanne Douglas" <hlwdjsd@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
news:hlwdjsd-5ABF34.20400004102006@newsclstr02.news.prodigy.com ...

He is not even remotely close to Pujols for the Top leader categories
posted [220 HR / 473 RBI]. He only played 4 1/3 years with StL (545G /
1,739 AB), and his last year (2001) he stank [.187/.316/.492].


Would you like to document where I am "re-writing history," Jeanne?
And what do you mean by 'again'?
I don't do things like that.
How dare you make up a vicious, dirty lie!
You ought to be ashamed of yourself.
But I know you aren't, since you admit you love B.B. despite being in
a very tiny minority who believe he didn't cheat.

"I thought I was getting flaxseed oil!"
--The SF Cheater

x-no-archive: yes

I swear I totally forgot about what's-his-name on this one statistic!
I put him out of my mind completely, that's why the omission.
It was an honest mistake, honest.
I apologize for the inadvertent error.


Cardinals HR Leaders, season

1. Mark McGwire 70 (1998)
2. Mark McGwire 65 (1999)
3. Albert Pujols 49 (2006)
4. Albert Pujols 46 (2004)
5. Johnny Mize 43 (1940)
5. Albert Pujols 43 (2003)
(tie)
7. Rogers Hornsby 42 (1922)
7. Jim Edmonds 42 (2000, 2004)
(tie)

TJ-BF wrote:


Inadvertant and honest my ass! I'll bet you don't think gay Republican
congressmen from Florida are pedophiles, either.

Accept the facts of life, Roy, and things will be much simpler for you.


Go Cards,
Tom

Tom wrote:

I'm guessing you meant to say *a* gay Republican[1] congressmen from
Florida is a sexual predator (particularly by the definitions of laws
he drafted) and may be an active pedophile. I'm sure you weren't
equating homosexuality and pedophilia.


Accept spin and ignore facts and things will be even simpler.
Nightmarish eventually, but simpler in the present.

[1] Though Fox actually tried to say he was a Democrat and even the AP
has used D instead of R, not only for him but for Hastert as well.

Mark_Reichert@hotmail.com wrote:

Absolutely not! I'm sorry you took it that way, Mark. One of the things
that's pissed me off about this mess is some of the ultra-conservatives
like Paul Weyerich and Sean Hannity are saying things like homosexuals
are overly preoccupied ith sex.

I was trying to make it sound like there's a wild heard of gay
Republican congressmen from Florida running around, with my tounge
firmly planted in my cheek. I'll have to work on that! ;-)


Exactly! Roy keeps spinning his outrage over steroid use and when he's
asked to address similar uses and misuses of legal substances,
processes and equipment, he dodges the issue and ignores the questions
posed to him.



I caught that, too. I guess Roger Ailes read the same book in college
about subliminal seduction as I read. If anyone thinks that
substitution was an accident, hoo boy, have I got a bridge for you! ;-)

Go Cards,
Tom

Tom wrote:

I'm glad I didn't take what you said at face value. I sometimes make
that mistake.


Sounds like he uses the Republican Playbook in other areas:

http://www.amazon.com/Republican-Pl...z/dp/1401302904

Changing the subject is an art the current radical Republicans have
mastered more than any previous Democrats or Republicans. They are
aided by the fact that hiding behind their 'liberal media' mantra,
they've either completely bought or intimidated the media into letting
them get away with it.


A bridge to nowhere?<g> Or that non-landmark in New York that doesn't
require Homeland Security money to protect.

Sorry to be so serious but while I came here to read about Albert and
the Cardinals for a break, my mood is still that sports is small
potatoes compared to the current problems and the coming economic
collapse.

In article <o32Vg.10239$UG4.5392@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink. net>,
"TJ-BF" <r4@att.net> wrote:


Delusional.


There is just so much wrong there, there's really nowhere to even start.

--
JD

"...if you think the 'Star Wars' prequels are a disease, then
'Serenity' is the cure."