![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
If so ..I will double or triple my usual wagers. I won the first two
games..( lucky as hell to do so ) .. I think the Cards can close it out with the " Soupster " We shall see.. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"After all is said and done - there's nothing more to say or do"
<fastpitstops@aol.com> wrote in message news:1160186365.385040.197310@c28g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com... Quote:
Apparently so... I'll take that o-fer with the DP to end the final threat. Sometimes the situation dictates that you have to pitch to him. The trick is to make good pitches and not just tee it up for him. If you make him put the ball in play, even a hitter of Pujols' caliber makes outs 66.2% of the time. If he had a pitcher pitch to him with 1 or 2 outs and 1B open, his head belongs on a pike. In the situations today, you can't give him a free pass with a walk so a single by the next guy is as damaging as a double off the wall by the big guy. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
K2 wrote: Quote:
I'm sure everyone will forget that the Cards four-run rally tonight started with a walk to Pujols. The first time he hits a home run in the LCS, we'll be hearing "why does anybody ever pitch to him?" The only damage he did in the two games in St. Louis was when he *wasn't* pitched to. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 8 Oct 2006 20:32:20 -0700, "Seapig" <seapig@altavista.com> wrote:
Quote:
Meredith hitting a batter when he was ahead in the count 0-2 .... Branyan throwing the ball wide of home plate.... |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hoover wrote: Quote:
I'm not sure what your point is, but if Pujols doesn't walk leading off that inning, there's a good chance that neither of those things ever happen. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Seapig wrote:
Quote:
Well, except for the 2 run home run in the first game and his RBI and run scored (the run came while he was on base for the hit he got) in Game 2; both of which were turning points and HUGE factors in the Padres' first two losses. In fact, he's only walked once, which obviously resulted in quite a mess last night for the Padres. However, there are plenty of other factors that you can chalk up to in that disaster of an inning Sunday night; Pujols just happened to be the first thing that went wrong. Of course, you do have a point. Pujols is a pretty damn big threat no matter what. Sometimes it's much 'safer' to walk him, and sometimes it's safer to pitch to him. -- doug |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
doug wrote: Quote:
I said the only damage he did *in St.Louis* was when he wasn't pitched to. K2 already did a good job of explaining why it wouldn't have made sense to walk him in the first two games. Quote:
And that's why everybody will forget about it - the stuff that happened later was a lot more dramatic than the walk, but the inning wouldn't have been any worse if Pujols had led off with a home run. Quote:
I'm not arguing that there aren't plenty of times when walking him is the right thing to do. I'm just getting tired of people (not only here, media types also) acting like you should never pitch to the guy. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Seapig wrote:
Quote:
Damn! My bad; I missed that (it's been a long couple of days, and apparently I just glossed over that part). Quote:
Yeah, Pujols is just damn good, and hindsight is always 20/20. If only the offense would've been able to hit even a little better with runners at scoring position, the Pujols factor would've been moot for most of the games. -- doug |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|