|
|
#1
10-11-2006, 04:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Why not Lastings?
Explain to me why Anderson Hernandez over Lastings Milledge activated for
this series? I would think that another outfileder would be more valuable than a spare infileder, especially with Floyd limping. -- JK Sinrod www.SinrodStudios.com www.MyConeyIslandMemories.com 
|
|
#2
10-11-2006, 05:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why not Lastings?
Glassman@work wrote: Quote:
1. Clearly Milledge is unliked. 2. He Garbage.
|
|
#3
10-11-2006, 05:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why not Lastings?
Glassman@work wrote:
Quote:
I think I'm indifferent. Here's why: Hernandez: - Less of a candidate to make a bonehead play. - With subpar pitching, Hernandez serves as a stellar defensive infield replacement. In fact, I can't name anyone else on the Mets bench that qualifies as a viable defensive replacement. Milledge: - With Floyd injured, another outfielder is certainly warranted. - The Mets can definitely use a power threat on the bench. - Scott
|
|
#4
10-11-2006, 05:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why not Lastings?
"Glassman@work" <jksinrod@aol.com> wrote in message news:Vf9Xg.7133$YD.6811@trndny09... Quote:
1.) Because, with Floyd still on the roster and available for pinch hitting, what the Mets really need is another back-up fielder 2.) Because Woodward can become a back-up outfielder, with Hernandez effectively taking Woodward's place as a back-up infielder In the end, the Mets like Hernandez' fielding over Milledge's hitting.
|
|
#5
10-11-2006, 05:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why not Lastings?
The Mets are already carrying five outfielders. It would help us to
understand if you would be kind enough to tell us who Anderson Hernandez replaced. "Glassman@work" <jksinrod@aol.com> wrote in message news:Vf9Xg.7133$YD.6811@trndny09... Quote:
|
|
#6
10-11-2006, 06:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why not Lastings?
"Glassman@work" <jksinrod@aol.com> wrote in message news:Vf9Xg.7133$YD.6811@trndny09... Quote:
HE GARBAGE.
|
|
#7
10-11-2006, 06:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why not Lastings?
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:48:53 GMT, "Glassman@work" <jksinrod@aol.com>
wrote: Quote:
Milledge was not on the roster Sept. 1 and therefore can only be on the playoff roster if another position player is injured. He could not be substituted for Ring.
|
|
#8
10-11-2006, 09:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why not Lastings?
Quote:
Which makes sense. But i wonder if it might be better to go with lesser bench and add a relief pitcher. Could live without Franco.
|
|
#9
10-11-2006, 09:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why not Lastings?
Topo Gigio wrote: Quote:
LOL !! I just shed a tear of joy right now.
|
|
#10
10-12-2006, 03:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why not Lastings?
Glassman@work wrote: Quote:
Because he would bring negative vibes being thet the locker room note incident was made public. Team chemistry is very important, who needs the media focusing on whether Milledge and his teammates are "playing nice", instead of just playing good baseball.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
