I'd like to revisit this topic. You can view the original thread here:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group...af8113dd7e87a76
I still say Gerald Green will not be an all-star in the next 2 years.
He may make it in 3 years, but that also depends on the decline of many
of today's great players. I still thing Josh Smith is better than
Gerald Green.
Everything Green did last night was against our reserves.
Finally, I would now concede that we may have been better off with
Green instead of Joey Graham, who, still hasn't shown me anything, and
I think we now own a fully developed Joey Graham in Anthony Parker. (I
mean, if Parker is Graham's 'upside', then I take Gerald Green in a
heartbeat).
I'd like to revisit this topic.
I still say Gerald Green will not be an all-star in the next 2 years.
He may make it in 3 years, but that also depends on the decline of many
of today's great players. I still thing Josh Smith is better than
Gerald Green.
Everything Green did last night was against our reserves.
Finally, I would now concede that we may have been better off with
Green instead of Joey Graham, who, still hasn't shown me anything, and
I think we now own a fully developed Joey Graham in Anthony Parker. (I
mean, if Parker is Graham's 'upside', then I take Gerald Green in a
heartbeat).
On Jun 17, 10:16 am, "ebrian" <ebr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
A steak dinner? *lol* I'm not going to take you on out on a date if that's what you're asking What are we betting on? That: (a)GeraldGreenwill never be an all-star, or; (b)GeraldGreenwill not even be as good as Josh Smith, or; (c) Josh Smith will never be an all-star, or; (d) Raptors should have draftedGeraldGreeninstead of Charlie Villanueva, or; (e) Raptors should have draftedGeraldGreeninstead of Joey Graham, or; (f)GeraldGreenwas worth waiting 5 years to develop. GimpyVince wrote:
Quote:
Wow. This sounds like a challenge. Want to wager a steak dinner on this? ebrian wrote:
Quote:
|
Greenwon't even be as good as Josh Smith, and Josh is still far from ever being an all-star.
|
GimpyVince wrote: > I say Roye or Foy without knowing which team picks whom. > These are the guys that are most NBA ready and can step in and > contribute now. Does that mean they're the best players? Nope. It just > means they could contribute sooner. It's sort of like CV andGerald >Green. Who? you say?GeraldGreen. > Mark my words. In 5 years time, CV will be a decent starter with > questions of work ethic surfacing.Greenwill be a perennial all-star > and people will look back at that draft and say "those stupid raptors > passed onGreenTWICE!". > pstevens2takethis...@gmail.com wrote: > > Okay, as I said in another thread, I can't remember this much > > discussion/disagreement about the Raps pick. Quite heated actually. So > > this is the way too early, stupidly early but nonetheless available > > opportunity for incredible bragging rights in the NG. > > Who is you pick for 2007 Rookie of the Year? > > I will jump right up to the plate and say Bargnani. Why? Cause he's > > foreign, mysterious, and obviously not a Dirk clone. And I'm just not > > that excited by the NCAA selections. I guess we'll be able to see just > > how wrong I am next year. > > Who's your choice? I want to see lots of action here.
|
|